Why does the rate of radioactive decay follow a decaying exponential function?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter onqun
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Decay Half-life
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion clarifies that radioactive decay follows a decaying exponential function, specifically described by the formula N(t) = N0 * 2^(-t/t1/2), where N0 is the initial quantity, N(t) is the remaining quantity after time t, and t1/2 is the half-life. The example provided illustrates that for a 20-gram sample with a half-life of 10 minutes, the remaining mass after various time intervals can be calculated accurately, debunking misconceptions about linear decay. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding exponential decay in the context of radioactive materials.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of exponential functions
  • Familiarity with the concept of half-life
  • Basic knowledge of differential equations
  • Ability to interpret mathematical formulas
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the exponential decay formula in detail
  • Explore applications of radioactive decay in nuclear physics
  • Learn about first-order differential equations and their implications
  • Investigate real-world examples of radioactive materials and their half-lives
USEFUL FOR

Students in physics, researchers in nuclear science, and professionals working with radioactive materials will benefit from this discussion, particularly those seeking to understand the principles of radioactive decay and its mathematical representation.

onqun
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
Hello, I am curious. Eventhough, the half-time of an element is always the same. Why not we can't find quarter of elements vanish time, because; half life is directly proportional, 10gr 10 min -> 5gr 20min. if 10 gr vanishes in 10 min, 2.5gr vanishes in 2.5 min for 20gr radioactive material.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I am a little unclear what you are asking, but your numbers are wrong. Your numbers imply some kind of linear decay, which is weird, i.e. that everything would be gone after 20 minutes.
We are talking about something that undergoes exponential decay, so to find the amount left after a certain amount of time you need this formula (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exponential_decay for info about where this comes from):

N(t)=N_0 2^{-t/t_{1/2}}

where N0 is the original number of "things" you have which are decaying, N(t) is the number left after time t and t_1/2 is the half life. For a 20 gram sample with half life of 10 minutes, i.e. N0=20 (mass is proportional to particle number) and t_1/2=10, then after 2.5 minutes you have 16.82 grams left, after 10 minutes you have 10 grams (duh) and after 20 minutes you have 5 grams left (two half lives), 30 minutes->2.5 grams, etc.
 
onqun said:
Hello, I am curious. Eventhough, the half-time of an element is always the same. Why not we can't find quarter of elements vanish time, because; half life is directly proportional, 10gr 10 min -> 5gr 20min. if 10 gr vanishes in 10 min, 2.5gr vanishes in 2.5 min for 20gr radioactive material.
See the discussion on half-life here.
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/Hbase/nuclear/halfli2.html

As kurros indicated, it represents a decaying exponential function based on a first order differential equation which indicates that the rate of decay is proportional to the amount of the particular substance (radionuclide) existent (still remaining).

Code:
0	1	
1	0.933	
1.9265	0.87500	1/8 initial amt decayed
2	0.871	
3	0.812	
4	0.758	
4.1504	0.75000 1/4 initial amt decayed
5	0.707	
6	0.660	
7	0.616	
8	0.574	
9	0.536	
10	0.500	1/2 initial amt decayed
                          one half-life
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
21K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
11K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
7K