Why Does the Rule √ab = √a × √b Only Apply When a and b Are Nonnegative?

  • Thread starter Thread starter parshyaa
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the mathematical property of square roots, specifically the rule that states √ab = √a × √b, and its applicability when a and b are negative. Participants are exploring the conditions under which this rule holds true and the implications of having both variables as negative.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are attempting to understand why the rule fails when both a and b are negative, with some suggesting a case-based analysis. Questions arise about the nature of square roots of negative numbers and the validity of applying the rule under different conditions.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants sharing insights and questioning each other's reasoning. Some have referenced external resources for further clarification, while others express a desire for deeper understanding of the underlying principles. There is no explicit consensus yet on the explanation of the rule's limitations.

Contextual Notes

Participants are grappling with the definitions and properties of square roots in the context of real and complex numbers, particularly focusing on the implications of negative values. The discussion includes references to specific mathematical rules and their conditions for validity.

parshyaa
Messages
307
Reaction score
19

Homework Statement



Prove that √ab = √a × √b is possible for all the value of a and b except when both are less than 0 at the same time .[/B]

Homework Equations



√(-a)b =(√a)i × b = (√ab)i

The Attempt at a Solution


I don't know how to start, to prove this type of question, but i think that there must be an answer for this.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
So what goes wrong when both a and b are < 0 ?
 
Divide it into four cases according to whether each of a and b is <0 or ##\geq 0##. For the case where both are ##\geq 0## it is easy. For the two where only one of them is ##\geq 0##, use the formula to prove the equation true. For when both are negative, prove it false.
 
BvU said:
So what goes wrong when both a and b are < 0 ?

This happens if a and b are less than 0, √36 = √(-4)(-9) = √(-4) × √(-9) = 2i × 3i = -6(which is wrong)
Why √ab = √a × √b not works when both are less than 0. It works when only one of them is less than 0, ex: √-36 = √(-9)(4) = (3i) × 2 = 6i, then why it not works when both of them are less than 0
 
We've had this before, haven't we ?
parshyaa said:
Okk, then why it is applicable here: √(-4)(9) = √-36 = 6i , √4i.√9 =6i, why in this example we divided negative number's root and positve numbered root. Why can we do this operation if only one of them is negative, why can't we do it for both the negative numbers.
I think answer is because it gives wrong answer.
You did check fresh's suggested link, I suppose ? Nothing unclear any more in that insight ?
fresh_42 said:
As usual when these questions come up, I want to recommend the following article:
https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/things-can-go-wrong-complex-numbers/

This is understandable if you are a bit familiar with complex numbers. You understand it has nothing to do with the modulus of the numbers (the absolute value), only with the arguments. Our definition of square root of -1 = ##i## and not ##-i## has a lot to do with it.

You repeat the question: Why ?

So apparently the answer isn't fully understandable for you. However, repeating those answers won't help. Perhaps you can get us out of this loop by specifying what exactly it is that's hard to understand ?
 
BvU said:
You did check fresh's suggested link,

Yes i checked his link and i got everything which was written in his link.


BvU said:
You repeat the question: Why ?
I repeated this question because, i fully understood fresh's link and it was written there:
Rule 2
If x,y≥0 and n∈R, then and only then (xy)^n = x^n × y^n and therefore we can't write √(-a)(-b) =√(-a) . √(-b), note here a and b are positive numbers.
But this is not my question, my question is why the above rule is only applicabe if x,y>0 why it is not apllicable when x,y<0
 
Last edited by a moderator:
parshyaa said:
I repeated this question because, i fully understood fresh's link and it was written there:
Rule 2
If x,y≥0 and n∈R, then and only then (xy)^n = x^n × y^n and therefore we can't write √(-a)(-b) =√(-a) . √(-b), note here a and b are positive numbers.
But this is not my question, my question is why the above rule is only applicabe if x,y>0 why it is not apllicable when x,y<0
The reason is that, for a < 0 and b < 0, ##\sqrt{(-a) \cdot (-b)} = \sqrt{a \cdot b}##, which is a real, positive number. However, ##\sqrt{-a} \cdot \sqrt{-b} = (-1)\sqrt{ab}##, which is a real, negative number. Obviously a positive number can't also be negative. This is the reason for the restriction that both a and b must be nonnegative.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: parshyaa

Similar threads

  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
13K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K