Why does the sequence $w_n = T^n(0)$ tend to infinity if $|z_0| > 2$?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Euge
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    2015
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The sequence defined by $w_n = T^n(0)$, where $T(w) = w^2 + z_0$, diverges to infinity when the modulus of the complex constant $z_0$ exceeds 2. This conclusion is derived from the properties of quadratic maps in complex dynamics, specifically the behavior of iterated functions. The critical threshold of $|z_0| = 2$ serves as a boundary for determining the stability of the sequence, confirming that values beyond this threshold lead to unbounded growth.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of complex dynamics and quadratic maps
  • Familiarity with the concept of modulus in complex numbers
  • Knowledge of iterative functions and their convergence properties
  • Basic grasp of mathematical proofs and sequences
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the behavior of quadratic maps in complex dynamics
  • Explore the concept of Julia sets and their relation to stability
  • Learn about the Mandelbrot set and its connection to $z_0$ values
  • Investigate the implications of the escape radius in complex iterations
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of complex analysis, and anyone interested in the dynamics of iterative functions will benefit from this discussion.

Euge
Gold Member
MHB
POTW Director
Messages
2,072
Reaction score
245
Here is this week's POTW:

-----
Let $z_0$ be complex constant. Consider the quadratic map $T : \Bbb C \to \Bbb C$ given by $T(w) = w^2 + z_0$. Show that the sequence $w_n = T^n(0)$ tends to infinity if $|z_0| > 2$.

-----

Remember to read the http://www.mathhelpboards.com/showthread.php?772-Problem-of-the-Week-%28POTW%29-Procedure-and-Guidelines to find out how to http://www.mathhelpboards.com/forms.php?do=form&fid=2!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No one answered this week's problem. You can find my solution below.
Let $\lambda = |z_0| - 1$. Then $|w_n| \ge \lambda^{n-1}|z_0|$ for all $n \ge 2$ by induction on $n$. Indeed, $|w_1| = |c| = |c|r^{1-1}$, and if $|w_n| \ge \lambda^{n-1}|z_0|$ for some $n \ge 2$, then

$$|w_{n+1}| \ge |w_n|^2 - |c| \ge \lambda^{2n-2}|z_0|^2 - |z_0| = (\lambda^{2n-2}|z_0| - 1)|z_0| \ge (\lambda^{2n-2}|z_0| - \lambda^n)|z_0| = (\lambda^{n-2}|z_0| - 1)\lambda^n|z_0|.$$

Since $\lambda > 1 > \frac{2}{|z_0|}$ and $n \ge 2$, then $\lambda^{n-2} > \frac{2}{|z_0|}$. Thus $\lambda^{n-2}|z_0| - 1 \ge 1$. Therefore $|w_{n+1}| \ge \lambda^n|z_0|$.

Now as $\lambda > 1$, $\lambda^{n-1}|z_0| \to \infty$ as $n\to \infty$. Hence $w_n \to \infty$ as $n\to \infty$.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K