Undergrad Why does the square of the amplitude of a wave function represent P?

Click For Summary
Born's postulate states that the probability of finding a particle at a specific location is given by the square of the amplitude of its wave function, ψ*ψ. This concept is fundamental to quantum mechanics but cannot be derived in a non-circular manner, making it a postulate rather than a theorem. While some advanced derivations exist, they require a deep understanding of quantum mechanics. For beginners, it is advisable to accept this postulate as a foundational concept. Overall, the discussion emphasizes the importance of Born's postulate in understanding quantum probabilities.
Haynes Kwon
Gold Member
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
Born's postulate suggests if a particle is described a wave function ψ(r,t) the probability of finding the particle at a certain point is ψ*ψ. How does this work and why?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It’s simply a postulate of quantum mechanics, you can motivate it based on various arguments but it cannot really be derived from anything in a non-circular manner.
 
  • Like
Likes Demystifier
  • Like
Likes Haynes Kwon
Haynes Kwon said:
Born's postulate suggests if a particle is described a wave function ψ(r,t) the probability of finding the particle at a certain point is ψ*ψ. How does this work and why?
It can be derived to a certain degree, but the most general such derivations are quite advanced. If you're still learning QM it is best to accept it as a postulate.

A derivation of it is basically if you acknowledge nature can have discrete outcomes in certain experiments with those outcomes having a certain algebraic relation to each other you can derive that all probabilities must come from a specific operator ##\rho## with the wavefunction being a sort of special case (pure state). See the thread @Mentz114 mentioned as well.
 
  • Like
Likes Haynes Kwon
I am slowly going through the book 'What Is a Quantum Field Theory?' by Michel Talagrand. I came across the following quote: One does not" prove” the basic principles of Quantum Mechanics. The ultimate test for a model is the agreement of its predictions with experiments. Although it may seem trite, it does fit in with my modelling view of QM. The more I think about it, the more I believe it could be saying something quite profound. For example, precisely what is the justification of...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K