Why Does the Stream Function Calculation Differ in Batchelor's Example?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the discrepancies in the stream function calculations presented in Batchelor's text (2000). The initial definitions of the velocity components, u = x^3 and v = -3x^2y, differ from the recalculated values of u = 2x^3 and v = -6x^2y. The error arises from a misunderstanding of the integration of partial differential equations, specifically the need to include an arbitrary function P(x) when integrating the continuity equation. The correct approach emphasizes the importance of revising concepts related to partial differentiation and the conditions for irrotational flow.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of partial differentiation
  • Familiarity with partial differential equations
  • Knowledge of continuity equations in fluid dynamics
  • Concept of irrotational flow conditions
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the principles of partial differentiation and its applications
  • Study the continuity equation in fluid mechanics
  • Learn about arbitrary functions in the context of partial differential equations
  • Explore the conditions for irrotational flow and their implications in fluid dynamics
USEFUL FOR

Fluid dynamics students, researchers in applied mathematics, and professionals working with partial differential equations in engineering contexts will benefit from this discussion.

tiredryan
Messages
50
Reaction score
0
In Batchelor's text (2000) on page 76, the stream function is defined as

<br /> \psi - \psi_0 = \int\left(u dy - v dx\right)<br />

where \psi_0 is a constant

Now I begin with a simple function for u where

<br /> u = x^3<br />

From mass conservation,

<br /> \frac{\partial u}{\partial x} + \frac{\partial v}{\partial y} = 0<br />

<br /> 3x^2 + \frac{\partial v}{\partial y} = 0<br />

<br /> v = -3x^2y<br />

Plugging this into the equation for the stream function

<br /> \psi - \psi_0 = \int\left(u dy - v dx\right)<br />

<br /> \psi - \psi_0 = \int\left(x^3 dy + 3x^2y dx\right)<br />

<br /> \psi - \psi_0 = \int\left(x^3 dy\right) + \int\left(3x^2y dx\right)<br />

<br /> \psi - \psi_0 = x^3y + x^3y + C<br />

<br /> \psi - \psi_0 = 2x^3y + C<br />

Now using the equations for u and v,

<br /> u = \frac{\partial \psi}{\partial y}<br />

<br /> u = \frac{\partial (2x^3y + C - \psi_0)}{\partial y}<br />

<br /> u = 2x^3<br />

<br /> v = -\frac{\partial \psi}{\partial x}<br />

<br /> v = -\frac{\partial (2x^3y + C - \psi_0)}{\partial x}<br />

<br /> v = -6x^2y<br />

I seems like the initial v=-3x^2y and u=x^3 are off from the recalculated v = -6x^2y and u = 2x^3 by a factor of two. Am I doing something wrong? Thanks.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Hello Ryan.

First off I recommend revising partial differentiation and partial differential equations.

In general with ordinary differential equations we add an arbitrary constant when we integrate them.

With partials you add an arbitrary function.

So your solution of the continuity equation should be

\begin{array}{l}<br /> \frac{{\partial v}}{{\partial y}}\quad = \quad - 3{x^2} \\ <br /> v\quad = \quad - 3{x^2}y\quad + \quad P(x) \\ <br /> \end{array}

Where P(x) is an arbitrary function of x alone.

You can see that if this is so then differentiation with respect to y will yield the same result, for any P(x) whatsoever.

Now you need more information to evalutate P(x)

I suggest you read on a few pages and try the condition for irrotational flow.
I'm afraid Batchelor makes a bit of a meal of it but the condition boils down to

\frac{{\partial u}}{{\partial y}}\quad = \quad \frac{{\partial v}}{{\partial x}}
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K