B Why does the Sun seem so bright?

  • B
  • Thread starter Thread starter thetexan
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Sun The sun
AI Thread Summary
The perceived brightness of the sun is primarily due to the number of photons entering the eye, as more photons result in a brighter perception of light. The human eye is evolutionarily tuned to the sun's blackbody spectrum, enhancing its brightness perception. While other light sources, like lighthouses, can emit significant power, their distance and beam spread reduce their perceived brightness compared to the sun. Additionally, the distance of light sources, such as stars like Sirius, affects perception; despite Sirius emitting more photons, its distance makes it less bright to the human eye than the sun. Overall, perceived brightness is influenced by both the intensity of light and the distance from the source.
thetexan
Messages
269
Reaction score
13
TL;DR Summary
Brightness of the sun
I would like to know why the sun seems so bright.

I know why the sun is a great source of light but that’s not what I’m asking. Why do my eyes perceive the brightness. Is it based on the number of photons that enter my eyeball? The more photons the brighter I perceive the light to be? Therefore a source that produces a lot of photons will provide that large number?

So, I’d guess the question is, is the difference between looking at the sun and looking at a flashlight and the corresponding difference in perceived brightness simply because of numbers or is something else involved?

Tex
 
Physics news on Phys.org
thetexan said:
Summary:: Brightness of the sun

The more photons the brighter I perceive the light to be? Therefore a source that produces a lot of photons will provide that large number?
Yes.
 
  • Like
Likes russ_watters and Bystander
Pretty much it is just the number of photons. Of course thanks to evolution your eye is particularly responsive to just the mix of colors put out by the sun (which is a blackbody spectrum for 6000 degrees Kelvin)
 
Your body also perceives a full bucket of water as “heavier“ when it contains more water molecules than a full cup. It’s the same idea.
 
thetexan said:
So, I’d guess the question is, is the difference between looking at the sun and looking at a flashlight and the corresponding difference in perceived brightness simply because of numbers or is something else involved?
Perceived brightness is essentially a measure of the power per unit area your retina receives (it's not quite that simple because wavelength matters and your eye's response is non-linear, but power is the heart of it). Thus the Sun is very bright because even the tiny fraction of its power that reaches your eye is still a lot of power. The lamp in a lighthouse is very bright because it uses a lot of electrical power to produce a lot of light power, but easily tolerable at distance because the beam spreads and only a small fraction enters your eye.

Lasers don't spread very much, and their coherent nature means that they focus down to a smaller spot on your retina than other light sources. Those two characteristics make them really good at delivering power to your retina at distance, which is why even quite low powered lasers can be quite dangerous to your eyesight.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes Klystron and sysprog
thetexan said:
Therefore a source that produces a lot of photons will provide that large number?
As @Ibix indicated, perceived brightness depends on how much light enters the eye ##-## it doesn't depend only on how many photons the perceived object emits ##-## Sirius is the brightest-to-us star in the night sky ##-## inherently much brighter than the Sun (about 25.4 times the luminosity) ##-## it emits a far great number of photons than the Sun does, but Sirus is so much further away (about 1.7 light-years away), the Sun is so much closer, that in our perception the Sun is so much brighter as to make the difference between night and day.

1649075019596.png
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Hello! I am generating electrons from a 3D gaussian source. The electrons all have the same energy, but the direction is isotropic. The electron source is in between 2 plates that act as a capacitor, and one of them acts as a time of flight (tof) detector. I know the voltage on the plates very well, and I want to extract the center of the gaussian distribution (in one direction only), by measuring the tof of many electrons. So the uncertainty on the position is given by the tof uncertainty...
Back
Top