Why Does the Tension Calculation for Charged Hanging Balls Show Incorrect?

  • Thread starter Thread starter IllTry
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the tension in the threads of two charged balls hanging vertically. The user initially calculates the tension using the formula T = -m*g, resulting in a value of 0.98 N, but receives an error when submitting this to their course site. They express confusion over the sign convention, noting that while gravity is treated as negative, tension should be positive as it acts in the opposite direction. Additionally, the user highlights the importance of considering the mass of the balls, which is 0.1 g, not 0.1 kg. The conversation emphasizes the need to clarify the inclusion of Coulombic forces in the tension calculation.
IllTry
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Two insulated balls of mass 0.1 g hang from the same support point by massless insulating threads of length l (as shown in the diagram below.) A total positive charge of 5.70 x 10-07 C is added to the system. Half this charge is taken up by each ball, distributed uniformly, and the balls spread apart to a new equilibrium position.
prob14a.gif

Assuming that the balls hang essentially vertical before the charge is added, what is the tension in each thread before the charge is added?




T=-m*g



I believe that since the strings are mass less and said to be essentially vertical, then the only equation i should need is Tension=-mass*gravity to get the force of tension on each string. so I have T=-(.1 g)(-9.8 m/s2)=.98 g*m/s2=.98 N but when I enter it onto my course site it tells me I am incorrect. Am i being oblivious to something?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I notice that you multiply 2 negatives in the last line, should not one of these be +ve?
 
What is the total force acting per metre of wall when the applied pressure is as sho

What is the total force acting per metre of wall when the applied pressure is as shown in the diagram? The maximum pressure is 65 kN/m2
 

Attachments

  • 4.JPG
    4.JPG
    17.6 KB · Views: 541
arithmetix said:
I notice that you multiply 2 negatives in the last line, should not one of these be +ve?

In my problem i am orienting the gravity to go in a negative direction, thus force on the ball is F=(.1 g)(-9,8 m/s2)=-.98 N, however, the tension in the rope acting on the ball is in the opposite direction (if i am wrong, please explain), so the Tension will be a positive value.

btw. I tried putting in -.98 N as well on the site and it told me i was incorrect. This is driving me crazy, it seems so simple!
 
Are you including the Coulombic force?
 
IllTry said:
btw. I tried putting in -.98 N as well on the site and it told me i was incorrect. This is driving me crazy, it seems so simple!

The balls are 0.1 g, not 0.1 kg
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top