Why does this anticommutator yield this particular result?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter space-time
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Yield
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the calculation of the anticommutator between the momentum operator \( p \) and the position operator \( x \), expressed as \(\{p, x\} = px + xp\). The user derived \(\{p, x\} = -i + 2xp\) using the momentum operator defined as \( p = -i(\partial/\partial x) \) in natural units. Confusion arose when comparing this result with other sources that suggested \(\{p, x\} = i + 2xp\). The resolution involves recognizing the importance of operator ordering and the relation \([A,B] + \{A,B\} = 2AB\) for verifying calculations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics operators, specifically momentum and position operators.
  • Familiarity with the concept of anticommutators and commutators in quantum mechanics.
  • Knowledge of calculus, particularly differentiation with respect to variables.
  • Experience with natural units in quantum physics.
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the properties of quantum mechanical operators, focusing on anticommutators and commutators.
  • Study the relation \([A,B] + \{A,B\} = 2AB\) and its applications in quantum mechanics.
  • Explore examples of operator calculations in quantum mechanics to solidify understanding.
  • Investigate common pitfalls in operator algebra and how to avoid them in calculations.
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in quantum mechanics, physicists working with operator algebra, and anyone interested in the mathematical foundations of quantum theory.

space-time
Messages
218
Reaction score
4
I was calculating the anticommutator between the momentum operator p and the position operator x (just pretend that p and x have the little operator hats above them). Here is the expression:

{p , x} = px + xp

Now we know that p is as follows:

p = -i(∂/∂x) (Note: I am using natural units so ħ = 1)
x = x

Now, to solve the anti-commutator:

px = -i * [ ∂(xf(x))/∂x] = -if(x) - ix(∂f/∂x)
xp = -ix(∂f/∂x)
px + xp = -if(x) - ix(∂f/∂x) - ix(∂f/∂x) = -if(x) - 2ix(∂f/∂x) = -if(x) + 2xp

Now just take out the f(x) (which was just a place holder function) and you should get:

{p , x} = -i + 2xp

However, some websites that I have gone to in order to check my work suggest that the answer is supposed to be:

i + 2xp (notice that the i has no negative sign).

Why is this? What happens to that -i that is supposed to be there? Did I make a careless mistake anywhere or did the website make a mistake?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
space-time said:
However, some websites that I have gone to in order to check my work suggest that the answer is supposed to be:
Please link to websites you refer to. Otherwise we have no way of checking what you are referring to.

Regarding your problem, it is much easier to use the relation [A,B] + {A,B} = 2AB, which holds for any operators A and B. You can check your answer using it.
 
In this link, note the ordering of operators in the final expression of the second answer. I don't know which website you're looking at, but pay attention to the order of operators.
 

Similar threads

Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
21K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K