Why Does Work Equal Zero When Force Is Perpendicular to Displacement?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Perpendicular
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the concept of work in physics, specifically addressing why work equals zero when the force is perpendicular to displacement. The formula for work, W = F . D x Cos(theta), is correctly applied, highlighting that when theta equals 90 degrees, the component of force along the displacement is zero. The error identified is in misapplying trigonometric functions, particularly the tangent function, to relate force and displacement vectors incorrectly. The correct approach involves recognizing that the angle theta must remain between the force vector and the displacement vector, leading to the conclusion that work is determined by the projection of the force along the direction of displacement.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic trigonometry, specifically sine and cosine functions.
  • Familiarity with the concept of vectors in physics.
  • Knowledge of the work-energy principle in classical mechanics.
  • Ability to interpret diagrams representing force and displacement.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the work-energy theorem in classical mechanics.
  • Learn about vector projections and their applications in physics.
  • Explore the relationship between force, displacement, and angles in physics problems.
  • Investigate common misconceptions in physics related to work and energy.
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, educators teaching mechanics, and anyone interested in understanding the principles of work and energy in relation to force and displacement.

Perpendicular
Messages
49
Reaction score
0
Hello, I am almost surely doing something wrong here, but I think it would be better if I drew a diagram to illustrate what I mean.

[PLAIN]http://img690.imageshack.us/img690/5830/workh.png

AB is Force, AC is displacement.

Now I know that work here = Force . Displacement x Cos(theta), by constructing a perpendicular between AB and AC and using sine-cosine functions.

When theta = 90, component of force along displacement equals 0 - this, I don't get, as since I use trigonometry to derive W = F . D x Cos (theta) I think I can do that here like this:

[PLAIN]http://img193.imageshack.us/img193/2720/work2i.png

AC = Force, AB = Displacement.

The angle formerly indicated as (theta) now has the sign of a right angle.

Now here, tan(theta) = AB/AC or AC x tan(theta) = AB. Therefore F x tan(theta) = D.

Thus Work = F.D.tan(theta).

Where am I going wrong?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
The angle theta is the angle between the displacement vector and the force vector. What you're doing in the second example is changing the meaning of the angle theta.
 
Mr.Miyagi said:
The angle theta is the angle between the displacement vector and the force vector. What you're doing in the second example is changing the meaning of the angle theta.

Lol, I know that. But it's not a crime to rename variables. Call that angle alpha or beta or gamma or what you wish.

I suspect my error lay in using the tan function.
 
What you have drawn in your second diagram is not a perperdicular between AB and AC.
You have (incorrectly) made the angle at A into a right angle.

What actually happens if you drop a perpendicular from AB to AC, you drop it from a useful point on AB, say B.
This meets AC in a new point D, so BD is perp to AC and the angle at D is a right angle.

The distance AD is the component of the force in the direction of the displacement.
the work done is then ADxAC = ABcos(\theta)xAC as required.

AD is also known as the projection of AB on AC.
 
Perpendicular said:
[PLAIN]http://img193.imageshack.us/img193/2720/work2i.png

AC = Force, AB = Displacement.

The angle formerly indicated as (theta) now has the sign of a right angle.

Now here, tan(theta) = AB/AC or AC x tan(theta) = AB. Therefore F x tan(theta) = D.
No, the way it would really work is:
tan(θ) = F / (component of F that is parallel to D)​
That means θ should be zero in the 2nd figure.

Thus Work = F.D.tan(theta).
With θ = 0, this is correct.

Where am I going wrong?
In thinking that you can construct a triangle out of the force and displacement vectors.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
770
Replies
8
Views
992
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K