MHB Why Does y ∈ xR Imply xR = yR in Theorem 3.2.19?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Math Amateur
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Prime Theorem
Math Amateur
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,920
Reaction score
48
I am reading The Basics of Abstract Algebra by Paul E. Bland ...

I am focused on Section 3.2 Subrings, Ideals and Factor Rings ... ...

I need help with the proof of Theorem 3.2.19 ... ... Theorem 3.2.19 and its proof reads as follows:
View attachment 8269In the above proof by Bland we read the following:"... ... If $$y \in xR$$ it immediately follows that $$xR = yR$$ ... ... Can someone please explain exactly why $$y \in xR$$ implies that $$xR = yR$$ ... ... Peter
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Peter said:
I am reading The Basics of Abstract Algebra by Paul E. Bland ...

I am focused on Section 3.2 Subrings, Ideals and Factor Rings ... ...

I need help with the proof of Theorem 3.2.19 ... ... Theorem 3.2.19 and its proof reads as follows:
In the above proof by Bland we read the following:"... ... If $$y \in xR$$ it immediately follows that $$xR = yR$$ ... ... Can someone please explain exactly why $$y \in xR$$ implies that $$xR = yR$$ ... ... Peter

I've been thinking about my question ... and think i have an answer ... as follows ...... to show $$y \in xR \Longrightarrow xR = yR$$ ...Assume $$y \in xR$$ ...

But then we also have $$y \in yR$$ ...

$$\Longrightarrow xR \subseteq yR$$ ... ... ... ... (1)Now ... let $$a \in yR$$ ... in addition to our assumption that $$y \in xR$$ ...

then $$ a = yb$$ for some $$b \in R$$ ... ... ... ... (2)

But $$y \in xR$$ so $$y = xc$$ for some $$c \in R$$ ... ... ... ... (3)

Now ... (2) (3) $$\Longrightarrow a = xcb = xd$$ where $$d \in R$$

So ... $$a = xd \in xR$$ ...

$$\Longrightarrow yR \subseteq xR$$ ... ... ... ... (4)Therefore (1) (4) $$\Longrightarrow xR = yR$$ ...
Is the above proof correct?Peter
 
(4) is correct, but I am afraid that (1) is not correct.

In the proof it is supposed that $yR$ is an ideal such that $xR \subseteq yR \subseteq R$.

Furthermore, $xR$ is a nonzero ideal and $y \in xR$.

$xR$ is an ideal, so for for all $r \in R$ we have $yr \in xR$, thus $yR \subseteq xR$.
 
I asked online questions about Proposition 2.1.1: The answer I got is the following: I have some questions about the answer I got. When the person answering says: ##1.## Is the map ##\mathfrak{q}\mapsto \mathfrak{q} A _\mathfrak{p}## from ##A\setminus \mathfrak{p}\to A_\mathfrak{p}##? But I don't understand what the author meant for the rest of the sentence in mathematical notation: ##2.## In the next statement where the author says: How is ##A\to...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...
Back
Top