Why doeslight "turn" when it travels through water?

  • Thread starter Thread starter marksyncm
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Water
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the phenomenon of light refraction when it transitions between mediums with different refractive indices, specifically addressing the misconception that slowing down does not inherently cause light to change direction. The user initially struggles to connect the concept of reduced speed in water to the bending of light. A key insight provided is the importance of wave crests and their continuity at the boundary, which necessitates a change in angle as light enters a slower medium. The mention of "wave front" clarifies the user's confusion and highlights the need for a deeper understanding of wave behavior in refraction.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic optics principles
  • Familiarity with refractive indices
  • Knowledge of wave behavior, particularly wave fronts
  • Basic grasp of Maxwell's equations (for advanced understanding)
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the concept of wave fronts in optics
  • Study Snell's Law and its application in refraction
  • Explore the relationship between speed of light and refractive index
  • Learn about Maxwell's equations and their role in wave propagation
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, educators in optics, and anyone interested in the principles of light behavior and refraction will benefit from this discussion.

marksyncm
Messages
100
Reaction score
5
This might be a silly question.

Ever since I can remember, I've been taught that when light crosses the boundary between two mediums with different refractive indices, its trajectory changes due to a reduction or increase in its speed. I've never given this a second thought, but today I realized I have absolutely no clue why this happens.

My problem is in making the leap from light slows down to therefore it turns. In my mind, slowing down would only mean that it gets somewhere a little later. So if it takes a beam of light 1 nanosecond to get from point A to B in a vacuum, it should take 1.5 nanoseconds if the medium was water, but that's about the only difference I'm conceptualizing as a direct consequence of light "slowing down". Just like if a car were to slow down from 100 MPH to 70 MPH; I would not expect this to cause the car to turn, say, right, by 30 degrees - it would keep moving in the same direction as before, only slower.

What am I missing?

Thanks.
 
Last edited:
Science news on Phys.org
There are many diagrams available to help you here. This link shows how the wave crests become further apart as the light (or any other wave actually) crosses from a fast medium to a slow medium. There has to be continuity as the wave crosses the boundary - the crests cannot suddenly turn up somewhere else - and the only way is for the crests to be closer to each other and for their angle to change.
BTW, I googled refraction explanation wave front and got a huge number of hits. Try it.
 
Thank you; the "wave front" part of the search is what I was missing. A regular search for "refraction explanation" turned up mostly simplified explanations that did not show me a direct cause and effect. Much obliged, will read up.
 
  • Like
Likes sophiecentaur
Your question is not silly. I wonder if anyone can help without help of maxwells equations.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
10K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 93 ·
4
Replies
93
Views
6K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K