Why Doesn't Earth Lose Atmosphere Over Time?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ChemGuy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Atmosphere Loss
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on why Earth does not lose its atmosphere over time, exploring the roles of gravity, volcanic activity, and external mass accumulation. Participants examine various factors that contribute to the stability of the atmosphere, including energy requirements for escape and the influence of the magnetosphere.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that gravity is a key factor in retaining the atmosphere, requiring high velocities for atmospheric particles to escape.
  • Others argue that the magnetosphere protects the atmosphere by deflecting charged solar particles, reducing energy input and thus the temperature of atmospheric particles.
  • Volcanism is mentioned as a process that replenishes atmospheric gases, although some participants challenge the terminology regarding the source of these gases.
  • One participant estimates that Earth has a substantial mass of atmosphere, suggesting that even with some loss, it would take an extremely long time to deplete it entirely.
  • There is a suggestion that Earth continues to accumulate mass from extraterrestrial material, which may contribute to atmospheric stability over time.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that gravity and the magnetosphere play significant roles in retaining the atmosphere, but there is contention regarding the specifics of volcanic activity and the terminology used. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the exact mechanisms and their relative importance.

Contextual Notes

Some claims about the processes involved in atmospheric retention and replenishment are based on varying interpretations of geological and physical principles, and there are unresolved details regarding the rates of atmospheric loss and gain.

ChemGuy
Messages
24
Reaction score
0
Why doesn't the Earth lose it's atmosphere eventually? I realize that gravity generally keeps the atmosphere close to the Earth but over a long period of time I would expect that we would lose some amount to the vacuum of space and the solor winds. Over millions of years we would lose it all! Whats the deal?
 
Earth sciences news on Phys.org
It will dissipate. But it is being refreshed by volcanism and other processes that liberate elements from the Earth's core.
 
Volcanism doesn't 'liberate elements from the Earth's core'!

Sorry but people keep talking about the core as some kind of generic name for the whole earth, and it's getting to me. Volcanism releases gases and magma which under a continental setting is recycled crust, or in an oceanic setting comes from the upper mantle.

The inner core is made of pure iron.
 
You're right Billiards, it seems kind of a habit. I don't think Earth is losing a lot of atmospheric molecules. The energy levels for escaping the gravity field seem to be much higher than the actual molecular speeds.
 
billiards said:
Volcanism doesn't 'liberate elements from the Earth's core'!
Agreed. I thought long and hard about the right word, but came up with nothing general enough.

"Volcanism liberates elements from underground" seemed to miss the point.
 
so back to the question, there are a lot of reasons why our atomosphere does not dissapear.

First is our gravity... It requires a velocity of 11.2 km/s to escape our gravitational field, which means that it would require each particle to have very high temperature (high energy) to get out.

Second is our magnetosphere. The magnetic field created by the rotating iron core deflects charged particles from the sun (the same reason we get auras), meaning that out atmosphere doesn't get as much energy as it could= less energy= less temeperature= harder to escape.

Third is the quantity. There is about 10^21 Kg of atmosphere! (really rough estimate) Even if we were losing 2 tons of atmosphere a day, it would still take more than 14 trillion years to lose it all.

Fourth is: yes, volcanic activity. As we are losing gas into outer space, we are gaining it back from inside the earth, creating an equalibrium.

I may be missing some reasons, but the main point is, i don't think we have to worry about losing our atmosphere. A bigger focus should be cleaning it up a bit.
 
Isnt the Earth also continually collecting more mass as junk falls into its gravity well? That is, the process that originally formed the big blue ball still continues to some small degree?
 
mheslep said:
Isnt the Earth also continually collecting more mass as junk falls into its gravity well? That is, the process that originally formed the big blue ball still continues to some small degree?

"Steel (1995) indicates that at present, about 40,000 tonnes of extraterrestrial material collides with the Earth each year but when the effects of larger impacts are taken into account the average over long periods becomes 160,000 tonnes per year."
http://users.tpg.com.au/users/horsts/transpermia.html

So only about a hefty ocean cruiser's worth.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 81 ·
3
Replies
81
Views
19K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
4K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
9K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
9K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
35K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
11K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
9K
Replies
15
Views
3K