Why Doesn't the Second Momentum Interpretation Work for the Rocket Sled?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the dynamics of a rocket sled subjected to friction and mass expulsion, specifically addressing why the second momentum interpretation fails. The sled, initially with mass M, experiences a constant mass expulsion rate (dM/dt ≡ γ) and friction defined as friction = μW. The first interpretation successfully derives the maximum speed, while the second interpretation falters due to incorrect assumptions about the momentum of expelled fuel and its velocity relative to the sled. The key takeaway is that the changing velocity of the sled must be accurately accounted for in momentum calculations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newton's laws of motion
  • Familiarity with differential equations in physics
  • Knowledge of momentum conservation principles
  • Basic concepts of rocket propulsion dynamics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the rocket equation and its applications
  • Explore the implications of variable mass systems in dynamics
  • Learn about the effects of friction on motion in physics
  • Investigate advanced topics in momentum conservation and its limitations
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in physics, particularly those focusing on mechanics and dynamics, as well as engineers involved in rocket propulsion and vehicle dynamics.

ecoo
Messages
86
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement



A rocket sled moves along a horizontal plane, and is retarded by a friction force friction = μW, where μ is constant and W is the weight of the sled. The sled’s initial mass is M, and its rocket engine expels mass at constant rate dM/dt ≡ γ; the expelled mass has constant speed v0 relative to the rocket. The rocket sled starts from rest and the engine stops when half the sled’s total mass is gone. Find an expression for the maximum speed.

Homework Equations



d(mv)/dt = F(x)

The Attempt at a Solution



To solve the problem, I found the differential equation for momentum, taking the momentum at a point in time and then the momentum a moment later, then dividing by a change in time.

This interpretation worked.

image.jpg


This interpretation did not work.

image (1).jpg


I don't understand why the second interpretation does not work.

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ecoo said:

Homework Statement



A rocket sled moves along a horizontal plane, and is retarded by a friction force friction = μW, where μ is constant and W is the weight of the sled. The sled’s initial mass is M, and its rocket engine expels mass at constant rate dM/dt ≡ γ; the expelled mass has constant speed v0 relative to the rocket. The rocket sled starts from rest and the engine stops when half the sled’s total mass is gone. Find an expression for the maximum speed.

Homework Equations



d(mv)/dt = F(x)

The Attempt at a Solution



To solve the problem, I found the differential equation for momentum, taking the momentum at a point in time and then the momentum a moment later, then dividing by a change in time.

This interpretation worked.

View attachment 211726

This interpretation did not work.

View attachment 211727

I don't understand why the second interpretation does not work.

Thanks
I do not understand how you obtained the first equation of the second method. What is your reasoning?
 
haruspex said:
I do not understand how you obtained the first equation of the second method. What is your reasoning?

I set up a differential equation for the change in momentum in a small change in time, according to the diagrams below. The second setup, when I solve, gives the wrong answer.

IMG_2753.JPG
 
ecoo said:
I set up a differential equation for the change in momentum in a small change in time, according to the diagrams below. The second setup, when I solve, gives the wrong answer.

View attachment 211728
In the lower left diagram, you have a mass m(t). This appears to be the total mass of fuel burnt so far. But you do not know its total momentum. It is not all at velocity v0-v(t) since v(t) has been changing.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: ecoo
haruspex said:
In the lower left diagram, you have a mass m(t). This appears to be the total mass of fuel burnt so far. But you do not know its total momentum. It is not all at velocity v0-v(t) since v(t) has been changing.

I see what you mean, but isn't that taken care of when we have change in time approach 0 (this is my next step to find an expression for change in momentum). And why would that not also apply to the first scenario, where fuel is also leaving while the rocket accelerates?
 
Last edited:
ecoo said:
isn't that taken care of when we have change in time approach 0
Perhaps, except that if you expand the second equation you find a term m(t)v(t+Δt). That is multiplying the fuel already burnt by the increased velocity, which doesn't make much sense.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: ecoo
haruspex said:
Perhaps, except that if you expand the second equation you find a term m(t)v(t+Δt). That is multiplying the fuel already burnt by the increased velocity, which doesn't make much sense.

Thank you for the help. I now understand what you were saying before.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
8K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
6K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
2K