Why don't dark matter and other such particles hit us?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the question of why dark matter particles and neutrinos, which are believed to be constantly streaming through the Earth, do not collide with ordinary matter, such as atoms in the human body or objects around us. Participants explore the nature of these particles, their interactions, and the implications of their properties on collision probabilities.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that dark matter is not weakly interacting but rather not interacting at all, primarily interacting gravitationally, which allows it to pass through matter without significant interaction.
  • Others argue that neutrinos are weakly interacting particles that can penetrate matter but do so very rarely, leading to infrequent collisions with ordinary matter.
  • A participant mentions that all elementary particles are considered pointlike, implying that classical collision models may not apply to these interactions.
  • There are differing views on the nature of dark matter candidates, with some proposing WIMPs (Weakly Interacting Massive Particles) and others suggesting sterile neutrinos or supersymmetric particles.
  • One participant notes that while neutrinos interact with the body at a low rate, the interaction rate of dark matter is even lower, which complicates detection efforts.
  • Another participant highlights the differences in detection methods for neutrinos and WIMPs, indicating that they are not observed in the same way.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express multiple competing views regarding the nature of dark matter and neutrinos, their interaction properties, and the implications for detection. There is no consensus on the specifics of these interactions or the correct models for dark matter.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the dependence on definitions of interaction types, the unresolved nature of dark matter candidates, and the varying assumptions about particle properties and detection methods.

WriterMon
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Hello,
I'm having trouble understanding why if there are dark matter particles and other such particles (neutrinos) streaming through the Earth at all times, why don't they just collide with the atoms in our body or the desk or what have you? I understand that they're probably "weakly interacting," but then again I don't understand it. Don't they have just physical size, and wouldn't they just collide or hit classically, or is there enough "space" around the nuclei of the atoms in our body that they can pass through?

Another way to ask this is whether WIMPs, if they exist, are passing "around" the atoms of my body or desk or actually through them. Either way the odds seem high that there would be many, many collisions. What am I not getting?

Thanks in advance!
Writermon
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I am not so familiar but...
Dark matter is not considered "weakly interacting" but "not-interacting" at all... it interacts only gravitationally (to give the needed "missing" mass for our cosmological observations). I think this would mean that it can travel through us without any problem...

I suspect you considered righthanded neutrinos? I am not sure why not- probably they are not the correct candidates for darkmatter. Also they are pretty massive to see...

Lefthanded neutrinos are weakly interacting, and they are extremely penetrating... There are chances for them interacting with your surroundings, but these interactions are so uncommon that nothing really changes... That's why in order to measure neutrino signals, we need to lower the background and the laboratories are deep under the Earth or seas...
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
WriterMon said:
I'm having trouble understanding why if there are dark matter particles and other such particles (neutrinos) streaming through the Earth at all times, why don't they just collide with the atoms in our body or the desk or what have you? I understand that they're probably "weakly interacting," but then again I don't understand it. Don't they have just physical size, and wouldn't they just collide or hit classically, or is there enough "space" around the nuclei of the atoms in our body that they can pass through?

All elementary particles are pointlike. Which means they have zero size. One should not think of collisions between them as little balls colliding! :wink: The probability that two particles might collide depends on how strongly they interact. Dark matter particles are believed to be everywhere, passing through atoms, through nuclei, through protons and neutrons... Most of the time they simply pass through undisturbed. Sometimes they interact, so if you build a big enough detector, you can see an occasional collision. So far they have not been seen.

There are two popular ideas what dark matter particles might be. They might be WIMPs. These are rather heavy particles (rest mass in the GeV to TeV range) that interact with ordinary matter with the same strength as the weak interactions. Or they might be sterile neutrinos. These are light particles (rest mass in the keV range). Sterile means they don't even participate in the weak interaction. These would have to be detected indirectly, perhaps by their decay into one of the ordinary kinds of neutrino.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
WriterMon said:
Hello,
I'm having trouble understanding why if there are dark matter particles and other such particles (neutrinos) streaming through the Earth at all times, why don't they just collide with the atoms in our body or the desk or what have you? I understand that they're probably "weakly interacting," but then again I don't understand it. Don't they have just physical size, and wouldn't they just collide or hit classically, or is there enough "space" around the nuclei of the atoms in our body that they can pass through?

Another way to ask this is whether WIMPs, if they exist, are passing "around" the atoms of my body or desk or actually through them. Either way the odds seem high that there would be many, many collisions. What am I not getting?

Thanks in advance!
Writermon

What you're missing is that the "WI" in WIMP stand for Weakly interacting. They don't collide with the atoms in your body because they interact too weakly with them to affect them in any noticeable way. It's possible that collisions do occur but they are too rare to matter.
 
ChrisVer said:
I am not so familiar but...
Dark matter is not considered "weakly interacting" but "not-interacting" at all... it interacts only gravitationally (to give the needed "missing" mass for our cosmological observations). I think this would mean that it can travel through us without any problem...

I suspect you considered righthanded neutrinos? I am not sure why not- probably they are not the correct candidates for darkmatter. Also they are pretty massive to see...

Lefthanded neutrinos are weakly interacting, and they are extremely penetrating... There are chances for them interacting with your surroundings, but these interactions are so uncommon that nothing really changes... That's why in order to measure neutrino signals, we need to lower the background and the laboratories are deep under the Earth or seas...

No, WIMP's are not required to interact by gravity alone. Other interactions are allowed as long as they are weak enough.
 
ChrisVer said:
Dark matter is not considered "weakly interacting" but "not-interacting" at all.

In order to make that statement, you need to know what dark matter IS. Since you seem to know, you should put yourself in for the Nobel prize right away. :smile:
 
phinds said:
In order to make that statement, you need to know what dark matter IS. Since you seem to know, you should put yourself in for the Nobel prize right away. :smile:

hehe, I find myself more into supersymmetric particles for dark matter, but of course (since we don't know what it is) it's a matter of personal aesthetics. Also in my statement (in which I said "is considered") is not something that doesn't exist (prolly I didn't understand the WIMP), since dark matter was proposed for counting as extra mass and because we didn't know any other trace of it, it would have to interact only gravitationally... of course some very weak interaction seems plausible too now that I think of it (dauto's comment)
 
ChrisVer said:
hehe, I find myself more into supersymmetric particles for dark matter
Note that the neutralino (lightest supersymmetric particle) is a variety of WIMP. It does interact weakly.
 
One neutrino interacts with your body every week. One muon goes through your head every second. Maybe Dark Matter is interacting with your body and maybe it's not. But how would you tell?
 
  • #10
Vanadium 50 said:
One neutrino interacts with your body every week. One muon goes through your head every second. Maybe Dark Matter is interacting with your body and maybe it's not. But how would you tell?

I would make you feel more somber ?
 
  • #11
Vanadium 50 said:
One neutrino interacts with your body every week. One muon goes through your head every second. Maybe Dark Matter is interacting with your body and maybe it's not. But how would you tell?
Well, we know the interaction rate (with comparable energy exchange) is low compared to the neutrino rate, otherwise dark matter would be clearly visible in neutrino detectors.
 
  • #12
mfb said:
Well, we know the interaction rate (with comparable energy exchange) is low compared to the neutrino rate, otherwise dark matter would be clearly visible in neutrino detectors.
Neutrino detectors don't see WIMPs, and vice versa. Neutrino detectors look for neutrino-specific reactions, which can be transmutations (e.g. Cl - Ar) or Cherenkov radiation from recoiling electrons. WIMP detectors mainly look for UV photons from collisions with nuclei.
 
  • #13
WriterMon said:
Hello,
I'm having trouble understanding why if there are dark matter particles and other such particles (neutrinos) streaming through the Earth at all times, why don't they just collide with the atoms

Because "collisions" you are familiar with are electromagnetic interactions on a microscopic level: atoms have electrically charged parts (electrons and protons), and when they try to go through each other, they repel.

Some other collisions aren't electromagnetic - such as neutrons colliding with atomic nucleus or neutrino kicking out an electron from an atom. But in all cases, collisions are the result of some fundamental interaction (in these two examples, strong and weak forces).

If a particle does not interact with matter, it *cant* "collide" with it. It will go right through.
If a particle does interact with matter but very, very weakly, it will collide very rarely, going right through 99.999999999999999999% of the time. Neutrinos are like that.
Think of dark matter particles as "heavy neutrinos". (BTW, it may be what they *are*, in fact. We do not know yet).
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
  • #14
Bill_K said:
Neutrino detectors don't see WIMPs, and vice versa. Neutrino detectors look for neutrino-specific reactions, which can be transmutations (e.g. Cl - Ar) or Cherenkov radiation from recoiling electrons. WIMP detectors mainly look for UV photons from collisions with nuclei.
They don't look for the same thing, but they are backgrounds to each other. I didn't see the other direction as it is hard to account for a background you do not know, but I would expect it to be there as well.
 
  • #15
mfb said:
Bill_K said:
Neutrino detectors don't see WIMPs, and vice versa.
They don't look for the same thing, but they are backgrounds to each other
Right you are. The latest Résonaances blog has a nice illustration of this.
 
  • #16
A friend of mine working on dark matter once said that if you take the current dark matter bounds from direct detection and convert this into an interaction rate with a human, you expect a handful of events in a lifetime.

So maybe that time you thought your phone was buzzing in your pocket but it wasn't there at all... It was on the desk. (That's a joke by the way)

But the calculation is possible if you make some general assumptions.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
5K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
5K