Originally posted by luther_paul
generouge
thanks for the point, but try clicking this link and look for the graph
http://scifun.chem.wisc.edu/chemweek/CHLRPHYL/Chlrphyl.html
green has the lowest percentage of absorption.. why? try figuring it out!
Topically, the answer is because the plants are green, duh

but seriously,
When you talk about the inefficiency of photosynthesis, does the losing of electrons constitue wastefulness and ineffcieicy? If so, the energy the e- give is used to unite stray ADP+P into ATP. Just a thought, don't know about it's validity.
I know your ultimate goal is to figure out a way to alter the composition of chlorophyll to make it more efficient. Do you know how this can possibly effect the environment? I don't think making chlorophyll black will solve anything.
When palladin mentioned overheating I believe he was right. If a plant were to work so hard an absorb all possible energy, it would die. It would transpirate at a much higher rate due to a high internal temperature. I am also not sure if the supply of H2O would hold up.
Also, you got your answer to the green light question. The plant is still able to go through photosynthesis , but at a poor rate. When would plants be exposed to only green light in nature? Never.
Now, if your goal is to understand photosynthesis to create more efficient solar panels, that's a different story. I also believe that kind of stuff is already being done.
Do you understand photosynthesis and it's mechanisms? If not, you should do that before trying to assume you can simply alter the composition of chlorophyll to make it and the plant more "efficient".