Why don't the ring velocities satisfy the inextensible string constraint?

12 replies · 3K views · last reply
Saitama
Messages
4,244
Reaction score
93

Homework Statement


(see attachment)


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I am not sure about this but as the string is inextensible, the component of velocity of the rings along the string should be equal. O' moves downwards and O moves upwards (not sure but it looks so). Hence, ##v_1\cos \alpha=v_2\cos \alpha \Rightarrow v_1=v_2 ## but this is apparently wrong.
 
Attachments
  • Printed problem 1.19: two rings O and O' on vertical rods AB and A'B', an inextensible thread fixed at A' and on ring O passing through ring O', with O' moving down at v1 and angle AOO' = alpha; find v2 of ring O.
    rings1.png
    37 KB · Views: 532
  • Diagram of two vertical rods AB and A'B' hung from a ceiling, with a string OO' whose ends are on rings sliding on the rods; angle alpha is marked at O, and the arrow v1 points downward at O'.
    rings2.png
    8.6 KB · Views: 530
There are a couple of equations that relate the positions of the rings with the length of the string and the distance between the poles. Write them down, use them to find the velocity of O.
 
voko said:
There are a couple of equations that relate the positions of the rings with the length of the string and the distance between the poles. Write them down, use them to find the velocity of O.

Position from where? Should I fix the co-ordinate system with origin at A?
 
Suppose the string has length s and the rods are distance h apart. When O'A' = x, what is the distance OA?
 
haruspex said:
Suppose the string has length s and the rods are distance h apart. When O'A' = x, what is the distance OA?

##OA=x+\sqrt{s^2-h^2}##?
 
Pranav-Arora said:
##OA=x+\sqrt{s^2-h^2}##?

How come OA grows infinitely as x increases?
 
voko said:
How come OA grows infinitely as x increases?

See attachment.
##OA=OB+BA \Rightarrow OA=x+\sqrt{s^2-h^2}##

Why is it wrong? :confused:
 
Attachments
  • Geometry diagram of two vertical lines labelled O and O' separated by a horizontal distance h, with a horizontal top line; points A and A' lie on the two lines, joined by a solid segment labelled s, and a dashed horizontal line from A' meets the left line at B.
    rings.png
    3.7 KB · Views: 463
How come BA is fixed? Surely as x grows, it should get smaller, because the string is inextensible.
 
It cannot be v1=v2.
Here's why:
Assume the distance between the two poles as 'x' and the string length 's', the distance to be traveled by O' to reach the height of O will be √(s^2-x^2). Now, as s tends to x (i.e the ring O' starts to reach height of the ring O, it will already have a velocity, whereas O will remain to be at rest till O' lowers and starts pulling O.
Therefore, V1>V2
You can try using trigonometric ratios to prove the same.
i.e
Sin(90-alpha) = √(s^2-h^2)/(s^2)
 
Pranav-Arora said:
See attachment.
##OA=OB+BA \Rightarrow OA=x+\sqrt{s^2-h^2}##

Why is it wrong? :confused:
Because s is not equal to the hypotenuse, OO'. The string runs from O to A' via O'..
 
haruspex said:
Because s is not equal to the hypotenuse, OO'. The string runs from O to A' via O'..

Yep, I realized it before I went to sleep.

This time I get ##OA=x+\sqrt{(s-x)^2-h^2}##.

Differentiating w.r.t time,
[tex]\frac{d(OA)}{dt}=v_2=\frac{dx}{dt}-\frac{(s-x)}{\sqrt{(s-x)^2+h^2}}\frac{dx}{dt}[/tex]
##dx/dt=v_1## and ##s-x=h/\sin \alpha##, using these
[tex]v_2=v_1\left(1-\frac{1}{\cos \alpha}\right)=-v_1\frac{2\sin^2 \alpha/2}{\cos \alpha}[/tex]

Is this correct?

I still don't understand what's wrong with my attempt in the first post.
 
Pranav-Arora said:
Yep, I realized it before I went to sleep.

This time I get ##OA=x+\sqrt{(s-x)^2-h^2}##.

Differentiating w.r.t time,
[tex]\frac{d(OA)}{dt}=v_2=\frac{dx}{dt}-\frac{(s-x)}{\sqrt{(s-x)^2+h^2}}\frac{dx}{dt}[/tex]
##dx/dt=v_1## and ##s-x=h/\sin \alpha##, using these
[tex]v_2=v_1\left(1-\frac{1}{\cos \alpha}\right)=-v_1\frac{2\sin^2 \alpha/2}{\cos \alpha}[/tex]

Is this correct?
A minus turned into a plus in the middle there, but it must have been a transcription error because it came out right in the end.
I still don't understand what's wrong with my attempt in the first post.
I didn't understand your reasoning there, so I can't say where it was wrong.
 
haruspex said:
A minus turned into a plus in the middle there, but it must have been a transcription error because it came out right in the end.

I didn't understand your reasoning there, so I can't say where it was wrong.

Thank you haruspex! :smile: