Why don't two objects bump into each other because of this gravity?

  • Thread starter Thread starter geekayphy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gravity
Click For Summary
Gravity causes all objects with mass to attract each other, but they don't always collide due to other forces acting on them. In a vacuum, two objects, like chairs, would indeed fall towards each other if no other forces were present. However, factors such as normal force and friction can prevent them from doing so in everyday situations. The strength of gravity is relatively weak for smaller masses, which also contributes to the lack of collisions. Ultimately, the interaction of various forces determines whether two objects will bump into each other.
geekayphy
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Why don't two objects bump into each other because of this gravity??



We know that, every object which has mass attracts every other object which has mass too. Now, why don't two objects certainly fall into each other? For instance any two stars or even any two objects which are not of that cosmic scale.like two chairs of different masses etc.


I'm very confused! :confused:
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org


geekayphy said:


We know that, every object which has mass attracts every other object which has mass too. Now, why don't two objects certainly fall into each other?

They DO, if there are no other forces acting on them.

For instance any two stars or even any two objects which are not of that cosmic scale.like two chairs of different masses etc.

If you put two chair in intergalactic space, fairly close together, they will likely fall into each other.
^Does this imply the existence of an infinite universe where each and every point in space is the centre[of course, due to infinite size of the universe]and so things never fall into each other. If it is so, then why do we fall on earth?
I have no idea what you are talking about
 


phinds said:
They DO, if there are no other forces acting on them.
But those other forces should act in opposite directions. Right?
What I suppose is the force of gravity is so weak that any object not very massive does not bump into any other object which doesn't have very large mass. Is this approach correct?
And yeah ignore the last part.
 


geekayphy said:


We know that, every object which has mass attracts every other object which has mass too. Now, why don't two objects certainly fall into each other? For instance any two stars or even any two objects which are not of that cosmic scale.like two chairs of different masses etc.


I'm very confused! :confused:
Two free objects initially in rest relative to each other do fall towards each other and they will bump into each other. A stone dropped from a tower falls vertically down towards the centre of Earth (and at the same time the Earth falls towards the stone). A stone thrown will follow a parabolic path, and falls to the Earth some distance farther. If you throw the stone so fast that its trajectory reaches beyond the surface of Earth it never will fall down, but becomes a satellite of Earth.
The Moon falls towards the Earth but at the same time it travels with a certain velocity and the result is a nearly circular orbit.
Read:
http://csep10.phys.utk.edu/astr161/lect/history/Newtongrav.html

There can be other forces which act against the force of gravity. It is normal force if an object is supported on a surface (as a book on a table) or friction between two chairs standing on the floor.

The objects move according to the resultant of the forces and their initial velocity. ehild
 
Last edited:


geekayphy said:
But those other forces should act in opposite directions. Right?
What I suppose is the force of gravity is so weak that any object not very massive does not bump into any other object which doesn't have very large mass. Is this approach correct?
And yeah ignore the last part.

No, it is not correct. The forces DO act in opposite directions. Each chair is pulled towards the other chair. The only question is whether there are OTHER forces keeping them from falling into each other.
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 55 ·
2
Replies
55
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
7K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K