Understanding Linear Momentum of Waves with No Mass

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on understanding the linear momentum of electromagnetic waves, emphasizing that waves can possess momentum despite having no mass. The relationship between energy and momentum is clarified, with the equation p = E/c illustrating how massless particles like photons carry momentum. The radiation pressure on a perfect absorber is explained to be half that on a perfect reflector due to differences in momentum transfer during absorption versus reflection. The conversation also touches on the importance of conservation of momentum in analyzing interactions involving light. Overall, the thread provides insights into the physics of wave momentum and its implications in various scenarios.
Darly
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Moved from a technical forum, so homework template missing
Hi people, I studying electromagnetic waves (intermediate) and
I don't understand how the expression for linear momentum of a wave is obtained, if the wave doesn't carry any mass.
In particular, I have to explain why the radiation pressure on a perfect absorber is half that on a perfect reflector

So, I do this:

P_rad= pressure
\vec{p}= momentum of wave
A= transversal area
Volumen= ctA
p_den= density of momentum =p/vol
P_rad=\frac{Δp}{Δt *A} =\frac{ p_den *(c *t*A)}{ t*A} = p_den *c
but i the books're saying that E/c =p ? Why?
Finally, p_den *c = I *c/ c² = I/c to case of absorbent surface.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
In a relativistic context, which you must use when considering light, the energy is given by
$$
E^2 = p^2 c^2 + m^2 c^4
$$
Therefore, a massless particle has momentum ##p = E/c##.

As for the second question, think about the difference in the before and after pictures of the collision and conservation of momentum.
 
  • Like
Likes CrazyNinja
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
847
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
9K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
8K