Why gravitational force is attractive? (and why dark matter is repulsive?)

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the nature of gravitational force, specifically why it is considered attractive, and the role of dark energy in the expansion of the universe. Participants explore theoretical aspects, including the hypothetical existence of gravitons and their implications, as well as the distinction between gravitational and electromagnetic forces.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants mention that gravitons, if they exist, would mediate gravitational force due to their spin-2 characteristic, which is theorized to always result in an attractive force.
  • There is a suggestion that dark energy represents a form of gravitational repulsion, contributing to the universe's expansion, but the nature of dark energy remains unclear.
  • Concerns are raised about the validity of citing unspecified sources regarding dark energy and its properties, emphasizing the lack of understanding in the scientific community.
  • Some participants argue that the existence of negative mass is not supported, questioning comparisons between gravitational and electromagnetic forces.
  • A participant expresses skepticism about how gravitons could relate to dark energy, given the current lack of knowledge about dark energy itself.
  • It is noted that dark energy is specifically associated with the acceleration of the universe's expansion, rather than expansion itself, which could occur without it.
  • Clarifications are made regarding the terminology used in the thread title, specifically distinguishing between dark matter and dark energy.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the relationship between gravitons and dark energy, as well as the nature of gravitational force. There is no consensus on these topics, and the discussion remains unresolved.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the limitations in understanding dark energy and the speculative nature of the claims regarding gravitons and their effects on gravitational forces.

parshyaa
Messages
307
Reaction score
19
Why gravitational force is attractive?
  • Some where it was written that gravitons are hypothetical particles which mediates the force of gravitation, and it has a spin of 2 , and Quantum field theory had proved that any particle of spin 2 characteristic will always mediate attractive force. But this theory is not yet proved .
  • And it was written somewhere that there is an exceptional case for gravitational force to be attractive. Ie dark energy is a case of gravitational repulsion and it is responsible for the expansion of universe. And it is due to the negative pressure effect of dark energy, what is this?
  • What if the existence of gravitons particle is proved, then how this theory will explain dark energy.
  • Some people say that gravitational force is always attractive because mass can never be negative, why we are talking about negativity or positivity of mass , why we are comparing it to the electromagnetic force(just like positve and negative charges repels and there is no negative mass therefore no repulsion)
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: bsheikho
Physics news on Phys.org
parshyaa said:
And it was written somewhere that there is an exceptional case for gravitational force to be attractive. Ie dark energy is a case of gravitational repulsion and it is responsible for the expansion of universe. And it is due to the negative pressure effect of dark energy, what is this?
"it was written somewhere" is not an acceptable citation here. if we knew what dark energy was we wouldn't be calling it "dark energy", we'd be calling it by a name that is descriptive of what it is.
  • What if the existence of gravitons particle is proved, then how this theory will explain dark energy.
  • Since we don't know what dark energy is, how could we possibly know how gravitons relate to it?
    [*]Some people say that gravitational force is always attractive because mass can never be negative, why we are talking about negativity or positivity of mass , why we are comparing it to the electromagnetic force(just like positve and negative charges repels and there is no negative mass therefore no repulsion)
    "Some people say" is not an acceptable citation here. I believe it was thought for a while that anti particles (the positron, for example) would have negative mass but that is not the case.
 
Ok , dark energy is called as dark energy because we don't know much about it, I was asking if existence of gravitons is proved to be right. And quanum theory had proved that if gravitons exist then they will always attract things(because they have spin-2) then how it will explain the expansion of universe.
phinds said:
"it was written somewhere" is not an acceptable citation here. if we knew what dark energy was we wouldn't be calling it "dark energy", we'd be calling it by a name that is descriptive of what it is.
  • Since we don't know what dark energy is, how could we possibly know how gravitons relate to it?"Some people say" is not an acceptable citation here. I believe it was thought for a while that anti particles (the positron, for example) would have negative mass but that is not the case.
 
parshyaa said:
... how it will explain the expansion of universe.
Look, we CALL the reason for the expansion dark energy because we don't know what it is. How can we know what relationship gravitions will have with something when we don't know what that something is? Gravitrons may have nothing to do with the expansion of the universe.
 
Thanks; your answer made me satisfied, how can I relate something to something, about which we don't know anything.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman
The usual approach is to describe it phenomenologically, as batman said, it's not who you are underneath, it's what you do that defines you.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: hsdrop and parshyaa
parshyaa said:
how it will explain the expansion of universe.
It won't. Dark energy is not needed for the universe to expand. You could have a universe without dark energy (until recently, in cosmological terms, the dark energy component was negligible) and it would still expand.

You need it to obtain accelerated expansion.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: parshyaa and bsheikho
Yeah, @parshyaa, I mispoke when I said we call the reason for the expansion dark energy. Orodruin is right, of course. We call the reason for the ACCELERATION of the expansion dark energy.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: parshyaa
In your title you have "dark matter is repulsive", it isn't but perhaps you are referring to dark energy?
 
  • #10
cosmik debris said:
In your title you have "dark matter is repulsive", it isn't but perhaps you are referring to dark energy?
Yes you are right,I don't know who edited my question , my question was only why gravitational force is attractive?
 
  • #11
A nonsense post and a bunch of follow-up posts have been deleted. I remind our forum regulars to click the report button for nonsense rather than the reply button.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: parshyaa

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
9K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K