Why is ##^{2m}C_m## equivalent to ##\dfrac{2m!}{m!m!}##?

  • Thread starter Thread starter RChristenk
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Binomial theorem
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion clarifies the equivalence of the binomial coefficient ##^{2m}C_m## to the formula ##\dfrac{2m!}{m!m!}##. The participants agree that the correct notation should include the factorial of 2m, specifically ##(2m)!##, rather than the incorrect notation ##2m!##. The derivation of the formula is confirmed through a step-by-step simplification of the binomial coefficient definition, leading to the conclusion that both expressions are indeed equivalent.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of binomial coefficients, specifically ##^nC_r##
  • Familiarity with factorial notation and operations
  • Basic algebraic manipulation skills
  • Knowledge of combinatorial mathematics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of binomial coefficients in combinatorics
  • Learn about the applications of factorials in probability theory
  • Explore advanced topics in combinatorial identities
  • Investigate the relationship between binomial coefficients and Pascal's Triangle
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in mathematics, particularly those focusing on combinatorics and algebra, as well as anyone looking to clarify their understanding of binomial coefficients and factorials.

RChristenk
Messages
73
Reaction score
9
Homework Statement
Why is ##^{2m}C_m## equivalent to ##\dfrac{2m!}{m!m!}##?
Relevant Equations
Elementary combination principles
By definition, ##^nC_r=\dfrac{n(n-1)(n-2)...(n-r+1)}{r!}##. This can be simplified to ##^nC_r=\dfrac{n!}{r!(n-r)!}##, which leads to ##^{2m}C_m=\dfrac{2m!}{m!m!}##.

But I can't see how from the original equation ##^{2m}C_m=\dfrac{(2m)(2m-1)(2m-2)...(m+1)}{m!}## is equivalent to ##\dfrac{2m!}{m!m!}##.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What do you mean? Your formula is incorrect. It has to be ##(2m)!## and not ##2m!##
\begin{align*}
^{2m}C_m&=\dfrac{(2m)(2m-1)(2m-2)...(m+1)}{m!}\\&=\dfrac{(2m)(2m-1)(2m-2)...(m+1)\cdot m}{m!\cdot m}\\
&=\dfrac{(2m)(2m-1)(2m-2)...(m+1)\cdot m\cdot (m-1)}{m!\cdot m\cdot (m-1)}\\
&=\dfrac{(2m)(2m-1)(2m-2)...(m+1)\cdot m\cdot (m-1)\cdot (m-2)}{m!\cdot m\cdot (m-1)\cdot (m-2)}\\
&=\dfrac{(2m)(2m-1)(2m-2)...(m+1)\cdot m\cdot (m-1)\cdot (m-3)\cdot (m-3)}{m!\cdot m\cdot (m-1)\cdot (m-3)\cdot (m-3)}\\
&\vdots \\
&=\dfrac{(2m)(2m-1)(2m-2)...(m+1)\cdot m\cdot (m-1)\cdot (m-3)\cdot (m-3)\cdots 2\cdot 1}{m!\cdot m\cdot (m-1)\cdot (m-3)\cdot (m-3)\cdots 2\cdot 1}\\
&=\dfrac{(2m)!}{m!m!}
\end{align*}
 
fresh_42 said:
What do you mean? Your formula is incorrect. It has to be (2m)! and not 2m!
I'm pretty sure that (2m)! is what this poster meant, but wrote incorrectly as 2m!.
RChristenk said:
By definition, ##^nC_r=\dfrac{n(n-1)(n-2)...(n-r+1)}{r!}##. This can be simplified to ##^nC_r=\dfrac{n!}{r!(n-r)!}##, which leads to ##^{2m}C_m=\dfrac{2m!}{m!m!}##.

But I can't see how from the original equation ##^{2m}C_m=\dfrac{(2m)(2m-1)(2m-2)...(m+1)}{m!}## is equivalent to ##\dfrac{2m!}{m!m!}##.
Multiply numerator and denominator by m!.
 
fresh_42 said:
What do you mean? Your formula is incorrect. It has to be ##(2m)!## and not ##2m!##
\begin{align*}
^{2m}C_m&=\dfrac{(2m)(2m-1)(2m-2)...(m+1)}{m!}\\&=\dfrac{(2m)(2m-1)(2m-2)...(m+1)\cdot m}{m!\cdot m}\\
&=\dfrac{(2m)(2m-1)(2m-2)...(m+1)\cdot m\cdot (m-1)}{m!\cdot m\cdot (m-1)}\\
&=\dfrac{(2m)(2m-1)(2m-2)...(m+1)\cdot m\cdot (m-1)\cdot (m-2)}{m!\cdot m\cdot (m-1)\cdot (m-2)}\\
&=\dfrac{(2m)(2m-1)(2m-2)...(m+1)\cdot m\cdot (m-1)\cdot (m-3)\cdot (m-3)}{m!\cdot m\cdot (m-1)\cdot (m-3)\cdot (m-3)}\\
&\vdots \\
&=\dfrac{(2m)(2m-1)(2m-2)...(m+1)\cdot m\cdot (m-1)\cdot (m-3)\cdot (m-3)\cdots 2\cdot 1}{m!\cdot m\cdot (m-1)\cdot (m-3)\cdot (m-3)\cdots 2\cdot 1}\\
&=\dfrac{(2m)!}{m!m!}
\end{align*}
Yes you are correct I should've wrote ##(2m)!##. Thanks for your answer!
 
RChristenk said:
Yes you are correct I should've wrote ##(2m)!##. Thanks for your answer!
You should've written!
 
martinbn said:
You should've written!
I'm sorry I didn't write ##(2m)!##. I will in the future do my earnest to double-check my work in the future. Please don't take offense at my negligence.
 
RChristenk said:
I'm sorry I didn't write ##(2m)!##. I will in the future do my earnest to double-check my work in the future. Please don't take offense at my negligence.
You misuderstood. I was pedantic about "I should've wrote".
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes e_jane and SammyS

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K