Why is 3 = a x (1)^2 x (-3)^2 in this step of the solution?

  • Thread starter Thread starter TheePhysicsStudent
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Graphs
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The equation 3 = a x (1)^2 x (-3)^2 is derived from substituting x=0 into the function, resulting in a(0+1)^2 = a(1)^2 and (0-3)^2 = (-3)^2. The values of x=0 and y=3 are confirmed by the graph, where the function intersects the y-axis at y=3. Additionally, -1 and 3 are identified as roots of multiplicity 2, as they are both roots of y(x)=0 and local minima of y'(x)=0.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quadratic functions and their properties
  • Familiarity with graph interpretation and coordinate systems
  • Knowledge of roots and multiplicity in polynomial equations
  • Basic calculus concepts, particularly derivatives
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of quadratic functions and their graphs
  • Learn about polynomial roots and their multiplicities
  • Explore the relationship between a function and its derivative
  • Investigate graphing techniques for visualizing polynomial equations
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in mathematics, particularly those focusing on algebra and calculus, as well as anyone interested in understanding polynomial functions and their graphical representations.

TheePhysicsStudent
Messages
21
Reaction score
17
Homework Statement
I understand everything before and after this line but not sure how they actually came to that conclusion, many thanks.
Relevant Equations
ax^4 + bx^3 + cx^2 + dx + 3
1705136477605.png

1705136497876.png
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Because they stated that x=0, therefor a(x+1)^2 becomes a(0+1)^2 = a(1)^2 and (x-3)^2 becomes (0-3)^2 = (-3)^2.

Note that the values of x=0 and y=3 come directly from the graph. You can see that the function (the squiggly line on the graph) is at a y-value of 3 when it crosses the y-axis, which corresponds to an x-value of 0. Therefor x=0 and y=3, which you just plug into the equation.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Nik_2213, WWGD and MatinSAR
Ahhhh I see it now, many thanks!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Nik_2213 and WWGD
For those that are wondering why -1 and 3 are roots of multiplicity 2, it is because from the graph we can see that they are roots of y(x)=0 but also they are local minima hence also roots of y'(x)=0.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K