Why is a paper falling slower than a heavier object?

  • Thread starter Thread starter jrm2002
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Falling Paper
Click For Summary
A paper falls slower than a heavier object like a ball due to the ratio of air resistance to mass. In a vacuum, all objects fall at the same rate regardless of mass, demonstrating that gravitational acceleration is constant. However, lighter objects experience greater relative air resistance, which slows their descent. The discussion highlights that while gravitational acceleration is independent of mass, air resistance creates a retarding force that affects lighter objects more significantly. The Apollo 15 Hammer-Feather Drop experiment illustrates this principle, showing that in the absence of air resistance, mass does not influence falling speed.
jrm2002
Messages
54
Reaction score
0
Why is that a paper which is freely falling down takes a longer time to approach the ground than a heavier object say a ball which is freely falling?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The ratio of air resistance to the body's mass. In a vacuum, feathers and paper sheets and bowling balls fall at the same rate.
 
You mean because the mass of the paper is less it experiences greater air resistance?
Can we interpret as follows:
1.The paper experiences gravitational acceleration
2.Acceleration due to resisting force acting through the air.
Then, since the mass of the paper is less it experiences gretaer acceleration due to the resisting force acting through the air(a=F/m).Right?
The gravitational acceleration is independent of the mass.
 
The air resistance has nothing directly to do with the mass. The air resistance creates a retarding force to the downward motion of the body. The greather the mass of the object, the better it can overcome this retarding force, and the closer the acceleration will be to the maximum of g.

It's helpful to work out the math behind this kind of situation, to help convince yourself of what is happening. I did it once after I had (lost) and argument with somebody about bicycles going down a hill. I said (incorrectly) that the mass of the riders should not matter, but it turns out that the masses do matter. Hold the rolling resistance and air resistance constant, and add mass to one rider -- do the calculation to figure out which bicycle goes faster down the hill...
 
Let's equalize surface area and material air flow resistance perturbations:
Take 2 objects, the first being a 1-foot diameter solid sphere of lead, and the second being a 1-foot solid sphere of balsa wood.

Both objects are then coated on the outside with whatever same substance and polished, such as to render equal any air resistance concerns.

On an ultra-calm day with no winds, drop them from the same height and at the same time from a tall building.
Which ball hits the ground first? The lead ball, the balsa wood ball, or both at the same time?
 
pallidin said:
Let's equalize surface area and material air flow resistance perturbations:
Take 2 objects, the first being a 1-foot diameter solid sphere of lead, and the second being a 1-foot solid sphere of balsa wood.
Or a 1-foot diameter balloon filled with air...
 
berkeman said:
Or a 1-foot diameter balloon filled with air...

A good extension, though I would not use a gas balloon in a serious experiment even in a calm wind environment due to the gases ultra-sensitivity and commensurate volume displacement from thermal influence which could affect the wind drag.
In addition, even in a calm wind, an ultra light balloon could be seriously influenced by even the smallest whisper of wind.
Nonetheless, your point is well taken.
 
jrm2002 said:
Why is that a paper which is freely falling down takes a longer time to approach the ground than a heavier object say a ball which is freely falling?

Here is something that may help you see what all the fuss is about... the Apollo 15 Hammer-Feather Drop experiment - on the MOON!

Go here jrm:
http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/planetary/lunar/apollo_15_feather_drop.html

-LD
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
40
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
1K