News Why is Atom Bomb limited to certain countries?

  • Thread starter Thread starter zorro
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Atom Bomb
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the complexities and limitations surrounding nuclear weapons development, emphasizing that not every country can easily create an atomic bomb due to the significant challenges in obtaining and enriching fissile materials like Uranium-235 and Plutonium-239. The Manhattan Project is referenced as a historical example illustrating the technical and financial hurdles involved in nuclear weapon production. Additionally, the conversation touches on the geopolitical implications of nuclear proliferation, with some arguing that possessing nuclear weapons serves as a deterrent, while others caution against the cycle of violence it perpetuates. The Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) is mentioned as a flawed but relevant framework in the context of international nuclear politics. Ultimately, the consensus leans towards the idea that the goal should be global disarmament, despite the practical challenges of achieving it.
  • #51
Abdul Quadeer said:
That is a different story. It is the responsibility of the government.

And if the government is / is controlled / infiltrated by these risk groups?
I'm sorry I really don't know the tension there.

Then I would stop making ridiculous statements about why countries such as NK should be allowed to hold nukes.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #52
Abdul Quadeer said:
That is a different story. It is the responsibility of the government.



I don't understand what do you mean by secure here. Do you mean that terrorists can't get their hands on weapons in UK/US or something else?






I'm sorry I really don't know the tension there.



I don't see any point in Iran fearing from its neighbours. It is the neighbours fearing from Iran.

Responding to the part in bold

Is it not simple logic that a frightened neighbor is more likely to be hostile?

You later ask why I or others would think that Iran would be more likely to use a nuclear device than other countries... well... they have called for the destruction of Israel, so that's a start. In truth, maybe they'd find themselves constrained by the same kind of fear of destruction that keeps North Korea marginally in line.

You could say that a country's willingness to use a WMD is in part inversely proportional to their investment in world affairs, commerce, diplomacy, etc. Iran, and NK are very isolated nations which have shown a willingness to sell dangerous military technology to people many western nations consider enemies. These are reasons from OUR perspective, to enforce controls.
 
  • #53
Thread closed temporarily for Moderation...
 
  • #54
berkeman said:
Thread closed temporarily for Moderation...

The consensus is that this thread needs to stay closed. We are not going to solve nuclear proliferation issues here.
 
Back
Top