Why Is Calculating Slit Spacing in a Diffraction Grating Confusing?

  • Thread starter Thread starter embphysics
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Difficulty
Click For Summary
Calculating the spacing between slits in a diffraction grating can be confusing, particularly when interpreting the ratio of slits to distance. For a grating with 500 slits/mm, the spacing between slit centers is approximately 2 microns. The ratio of slits to distance does not directly indicate the gap between slits; instead, it reflects the distance between their centers. Understanding that the relevant measurement is the distance from the center of one slit to the center of the next is crucial for solving related problems. Clarity on terminology, such as "slit" versus "groove," may also impact the interpretation of questions in lab settings.
embphysics
Messages
67
Reaction score
0
Okay, I understand this is a highly trivial problem, yet for some reason, it is bestowing much difficulty upon me.

If a diffraction grating has 500 slits/mm, what is the spacing between each slit?

Evidently the spacing between each slit is given by the inverse of that ratio. I am having trouble grasping this fact. To attempting to gain some insight, I began with something simple: suppose we have two slits, both of which, including the space between them, are 1 inch in length, \displaystyle \frac{2~slits}{1~in}. The inverse of this, \displaystyle \frac{0.5~in}{1~slit}, suggests that there...And this is where the uncertainty comes into play. I would view the ratio as saying that each slit is 0.5 inches in length, and two together would be 1 inch; but this suggests that there is no spacing between.

Could someone possibly help me?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The spacing in diffraction gratings is usually from the canter of one slit to the center of the next slit.

if you have 500 slits/ mm, you can divide the numerator and denominator both by 500 to get

\frac{500\; \text{slits}}{\text{mm}} (\frac{\frac{1}{500}}{\frac{1}{500}}) = \frac{1\; \text{slit}}{\frac{1}{500}\text{mm}} = \frac{1\; \text{slit}}{2\mu \text{m}}

or about 2 microns from the center of one slit, to the center of the next slit.
 
So, then this ratio tells me nothing of the spacing between each slit?
 
embphysics said:
So, then this ratio tells me nothing of the spacing between each slit?
That's right. If you know the width of each slit then you can simply subtract that.
But why do you care what the gap between the slits is? It's the distance between slit centres that matters for interference.
 
Well, I am trying to answer this ostensibly easy lab question, but clearly it isn't turning out to be so. Would it matter that I used the word slit instead of groove?
 
Last edited:
embphysics said:
Well, I am trying to answer this ostensibly easy lab question, but clearly it isn't turning out to be so. Would it matter that I used the word slit instead of groove?
Are you sure the question is literally asking for the gap between the slits? Might it not mean the gap between the slit centres?
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
13K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
792