Why is Channel 1 Connected Across CR and LR Circuits?

  • Thread starter Thread starter momomo_mo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Circuits
Click For Summary
Channel 1 of the oscilloscope is connected across both the capacitor and resistor to avoid grounding issues that could arise from connecting probes to different points in the circuit. This configuration ensures that both probes share a common ground, preventing potential damage or inaccurate readings. By measuring the voltage across both components, the difference between the two channels provides a clear representation of the voltage across the capacitor. This method is essential for accurate analysis in AC circuits. Proper grounding and probe placement are crucial for reliable oscilloscope measurements.
momomo_mo
Messages
25
Reaction score
0
Assume there is a capacitor and resistance connecting in series in a.c. Now channel 1 of the CRO acroos both the capaciotr and resistor and channel 2 across the resistor.The trace on channel 1 was taken as the p.d. across the capacitor and that on channel 2 as the current through the capacitor.
But I want to know why channel 1 is connected across both the capacitor and resistor and not only the capacitor?

Thank You
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Most oscilloscopes measure from ground to the probe tip. If you connected one probe across the resistor and the other across the capacitor, you'd ground two different points in your circuit which would give you bad results at best or melt something at worst. So you connect both grounds together at one point, at the bottom of the resistor in your case, and the probe tips to the tops of the R and C. The difference between the two channels gives pure voltage across C.
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
853
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
987