Why is it quieter to lower your hand when you catch a falling ball?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the physics of catching a falling ball and the relationship between force, energy, and sound. When a hand is lowered to catch a ball, the force exerted is less due to the extended time over which momentum changes, resulting in a quieter catch. Despite the same gravitational potential energy (GPE) being transferred in both scenarios, the sound energy released is significantly lower when the hand moves downward. The conversation concludes that the work done in both situations is equal, and the absorption of kinetic energy by the arm is a biological factor rather than a physical one.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newton's laws of motion
  • Basic knowledge of gravitational potential energy (GPE)
  • Familiarity with momentum and its conservation
  • Awareness of sound energy generation and absorption
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the principles of momentum and impulse in physics
  • Study the relationship between force, energy, and sound in collisions
  • Investigate the biomechanics of catching and energy absorption in the human body
  • Learn about the physics of sound waves and their generation in various scenarios
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, educators, sports scientists, and anyone interested in the mechanics of motion and sound energy in dynamic systems.

Alexander350
Messages
36
Reaction score
1
If there is a ball falling from a height due to gravity, and you keep your hand still and let the ball fall onto it, it stops suddenly and makes a loud noise. However, if you lower your hand as you catch the ball, like when a cricketer catches a fast moving ball, the catch is almost silent. I understand that in the second scenario, the force exerted is lower because the change in momentum of the ball occurs in a longer time. However, since there is the same amount of GPE being transferred during the collision, why does the second one have a lot less sound energy being released than the first?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Alexander350 said:
However, since there is the same amount of GPE being transferred during the collision, why does the second one have a lot less sound energy being released than the first?

Alexander350 said:
I understand that in the second scenario, the force exerted is lower because the change in momentum of the ball occurs in a longer time

you answered your own question
what don't you like about that answer ?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: russ_watters
What causes the release of sound energy? It kind of looks to me like you answered your own question when describing its background!
 
davenn said:
you answered your own question
what don't you like about that answer ?

russ_watters said:
What causes the release of sound energy? It kind of looks to me like you answered your own question when describing its background!

I can't seem to understand the relationship between the force and the energy. How can the second one have a lesser force and therefore less sound, but then the same amount of energy still get lost? Where does the energy go if it isn't sound or kinetic or GPE, and I can't imagine it being heat or anything else?
 
Alexander350 said:
I can't seem to understand the relationship between the force and the energy. How can the second one have a lesser force and therefore less sound, but then the same amount of energy still get lost? Where does the energy go if it isn't sound or kinetic or GPE, and I can't imagine it being heat or anything else?
You still answered that, though didn't go into the details:
...you lower your hand as you catch the ball...
 
russ_watters said:
You still answered that, though didn't go into the details:
Is it stored in your arm as if it were a spring, and if so, why doesn't it stretch back afterwards?
 
Alexander350 said:
Is it stored in your arm as if it were a spring, and if so, why doesn't it stretch back afterwards?
Well, kind of, but no; you don't let it. You have control over your muscles and making them do stuff consumes energy.
 
russ_watters said:
Well, kind of, but no; you don't let it. You have control over your muscles and making them do stuff consumes energy.
So isn't the energy used even more then... Why do you have to use energy to catch it but then less energy is released afterwards?
 
Alexander350 said:
So isn't the energy used even more then... Why do you have to use energy to catch it but then less energy is released afterwards?
All of the kinetic energy of the ball is absorbed by one thing or another (almost all by your arm) in both cases. How much energy you need to apply to your arm to make that happen is a matter of biology, not physics. It isn't actually clear to me which requires more.
 
  • #10
russ_watters said:
All of the kinetic energy of the ball is absorbed by one thing or another (almost all by your arm) in both cases. How much energy you need to apply to your arm to make that happen is a matter of biology, not physics. It isn't actually clear to me which requires more.
OK, so to sum up, the force when moving your hand down is lower which makes a quieter sound, but the work done in both situations is equal and the loss of kinetic energy into the arm is biology so not part of the problem. Thanks.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 53 ·
2
Replies
53
Views
5K
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
43K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K