Why is it that the torque of the pin is not zero in this problem?

  • Thread starter Thread starter bcjochim07
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Torque
Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around the concept of torque in static equilibrium, specifically regarding a pin that prevents a rod from rotating. The calculated torque of the pin is 11.76 Nm, which raises confusion about why the torque around the pin is not zero, as static equilibrium typically requires. It is clarified that while the pin can be considered a pivot point, the frictional forces acting on the pin create torque that is not zero because they are located at the pin's radius from the center. This situation is likened to a pencil spinning through a card, where frictional forces also create torque despite the pivot being at the center. Understanding this distinction is crucial for solving similar problems correctly.
bcjochim07
Messages
366
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


How much torque must the pin exert to keep the rod from rotating ?

atorque.jpg



Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



Tnet=0= -(.500kg)(9.80)(.80m) - (2.0kg)(9.80)(.40m) + torque of pin
Torque of pin = 11.76 Nm which is correct, but I am confused about something

To get this answer I found the torque about the pin and said that the torque exerted by the pin must equal that. But I thought that for static equilibrium, the torque around each point had to be zero, and it is not 0 around the pin in this case. Why is this?

For other problems, my book suggests to pick a point as the pivot point. Then the torque of the forces at that point becomes zero and the sum of the torques of the other forces around this pivot must equal zero. This is what bothers me about this question. If I pick the pin as the pivot, shouldn't sum of torques exerted by gravity on the rod & mass = 0?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This is indeed interesting... it seems that if you pick any of the points that forces are acting on, you will get an incorrect answer (or something that doesn't make sense). Can anyone shed light onto the situation, because I don't know.
 
If I'm understanding the picture correctly, the torque from the pin is from the frictional force between the sides of the pin and the walls of the hole that it is in. (There are other forces from the pin as well, but I think the point is that if the pin were frictionless it would be impossible for the beam to not rotate.)

So we can choose a pivot point at the center of the pin, but the frictional forces are not located there; they are a pin's radius away from the center, and so their torque about the center of the pin will not be zero.


This part of the problem would be rather analogous to sticking a pencil through an index card and spinning it. We can put the pivot point at the center of the pencil to calculate the torque, but the torque from the pencil on the card is not zero because the frictional forces between pencil and card (that cause the torque) are located at the surface of the pencil.
 
Thread 'Correct statement about size of wire to produce larger extension'
The answer is (B) but I don't really understand why. Based on formula of Young Modulus: $$x=\frac{FL}{AE}$$ The second wire made of the same material so it means they have same Young Modulus. Larger extension means larger value of ##x## so to get larger value of ##x## we can increase ##F## and ##L## and decrease ##A## I am not sure whether there is change in ##F## for first and second wire so I will just assume ##F## does not change. It leaves (B) and (C) as possible options so why is (C)...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K