Sum of torques, equilibrium problem

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a problem involving the sum of torques and equilibrium, specifically related to a rod and attached masses. Participants are exploring how to calculate the torques acting on the system and the appropriate method for determining the rotational axis.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the necessity of applying a force equal to the gravitational force on the objects. There is confusion regarding how to account for the torque produced by the rod's mass and whether to divide it into parts to analyze the torques effectively. Some suggest using integration to calculate the torque for the rod, while others propose using the center of mass for simplification.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, offering various approaches to calculate the torques. Some guidance has been provided regarding the use of integration and the consideration of the rod's center of mass. However, there is no explicit consensus on the best method to proceed.

Contextual Notes

Assumptions about the uniformity of the rod's thickness and linear density are being discussed. Participants are also considering the implications of choosing different points as the rotational axis for torque calculations.

Jaccobtw
Messages
167
Reaction score
32
Homework Statement
A horizontal 2 kg rod is 2 m long. An 8 kg block is suspended from its left end, and a 4 kg block is suspended from its right end. (a) Determine the magnitude and direction of the single extra force necessary to keep the rod in mechanical equilibrium. (b) At what distance from the left end of the rod must the point of application of this force be?
Relevant Equations
Torque = perpendicular F * radius
Σ T = 0
For part a, A force must be applied so that the entire mass can be 'held up'. Therefore the necessary force must be equal to the gravitation force on all the objects:

m(rod) * 9.8 + m(LB) * 9.8 + m(RB) * 9.8 = 137 N

For part b, (This is where I'm confused) let's set the point at which the force is to be applied as the rotational axis. This will be a distance x from the left end of the rod and we will solve for x.

Torque 1 = r(1) * m(LB) * g = x * m(LB) * g (counterclockwise)
Torque 2 = r(2) + m(RB) * g = - (l-x) * m(LB) * g (clockwise)
Torque 3 = ?

The third torque should be from the mass of the rod, but I'm confused. Should we divide the mass of the rod into two parts and find the center of mass of each part and then set one of them as a clockwise torque and the other as a counterclockwise torque? Thanks for your help
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Assume the rod is of uniform thickness along its length. Then it will have a linear density of L = 1 kg / m.

So now, with the rod supported at x, the torque produced by some small portion of the rod can be calculated. You could break the rod into two parts, one length x, the other 2-x. You could then look up the torque results for rotating a rod around its end.

Or you could be brave and do the integral. Remember that Torque 1 and Torque 2 are special cases of this integral where you have assumed the blocks have zero extent. For the rod you can't do that. You will need to integrate $$\int L s ds$$ from s = -x to s = 2-x.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Jaccobtw
DEvens said:
Assume the rod is of uniform thickness along its length. Then it will have a linear density of L = 1 kg / m.

So now, with the rod supported at x, the torque produced by some small portion of the rod can be calculated. You could break the rod into two parts, one length x, the other 2-x. You could then look up the torque results for rotating a rod around its end.

Or you could be brave and do the integral. Remember that Torque 1 and Torque 2 are special cases of this integral where you have assumed the blocks have zero extent. For the rod you can't do that. You will need to integrate $$\int L s ds$$ from s = -x to s = 2-x.

Brave it'd be indeed haha. I supposed we could also use the center of mass of the rod and use it as a clockwise torque:

Torque 3 = -(l/2 - x) * m(rod) * g

I'm wondering what you think?
 
Jaccobtw said:
lets set the point at which the force is to be applied as the rotational axis
The algebra would be simpler using one end as the axis, preferably the end x is measured from.
Jaccobtw said:
Torque 3 = -(l/2 - x) * m(rod) * g
Yes.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Jaccobtw

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
4K