MHB Why Is ln(1+x) Greater Than x/(2+x) for x > 0?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Lisa91
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
For x > 0, the inequality ln(1+x) > x/(2+x) holds true. The function f(x) = ln(1+x) - x/(2+x) is defined, and its derivative f'(x) = (x^2 + 2x + 2)/((1+x)(2+x)^2) is positive, indicating that f(x) is strictly increasing in the interval (0, +∞). Additionally, as x approaches 0 from the right, f(x) approaches 0, confirming that f(x) starts at 0 and increases thereafter. Thus, the inequality is proven valid for all positive x. The discussion effectively demonstrates the relationship between the two expressions.
Lisa91
Messages
29
Reaction score
0
How to prove that for x>0
\ln(1+x) > \frac{x}{2+x} is true?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Lisa91 said:
How to prove that for x>0
\ln(1+x) > \frac{x}{2+x} is true?

Yes, it is true. One way to prove it: denote, $f(x)=\ln(1+x) - \dfrac{x}{2+x}$, then $f'(x)=\ldots=\dfrac{x^2+2x+2}{(1+x)(2+x)^2}>0$ for all $x>0$. This means that $f$ is strictly increasing in $(0,+\infty)$. On the other hand,

$\displaystyle\lim_{x\to 0^+}f(x)=\displaystyle\lim_{x\to 0^+}\left(x+o(x)-\frac{x}{2+x}\right)=0$.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K