Why Is My Calculation of Angular Acceleration Incorrect?

  • Thread starter Thread starter maniacp08
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Angular
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving a turntable that is rotating at a specific speed and comes to rest over a given time period, requiring calculations of angular acceleration, average angular velocity, and the number of revolutions before stopping. The subject area is angular motion and kinematics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss their calculations for angular acceleration and question the correctness of their results. There is confusion regarding the sign of acceleration and how to calculate average angular velocity. Some participants express uncertainty about the units and the conversion between radians and revolutions.

Discussion Status

Several participants have shared their calculations and expressed doubts about their accuracy. Clarifications have been offered regarding the average angular velocity and the interpretation of the results, but there is no explicit consensus on the correct values or methods yet.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention the need for precision in significant figures and the potential requirements from their instructor regarding the format of their answers. There is also a discussion about the assumptions made in the problem, such as constant angular acceleration.

maniacp08
Messages
115
Reaction score
0
When a turntable rotating at 33 1/3 rev/min is shut off, it comes to rest in 26 s. Assume constant angular acceleration.
(a) Find the angular acceleration.
rad/s2

(b) Find the average angular velocity of the turntable.
rad/s

(c) Find the number of revolutions it makes before stopping.
rev

For Part A I did:
omega = omega initial + alpha * t
omega = alpha * t
omega/t = alpha

(33.3 rev/min) / (26s) * (2Pi rad) / (1 rev) * (1 min) /(60s)
= .1341218402 rad/s^2 = approx .13 rad/s^2
but this is wrong.

For Part C:
displacement = omega initial + 1/2 alpha * t^2
= 1/2(.1341218402 rad/s^2)(26s)^2
=45.33318199 approx = 45 revolutions.

For Part B is it taking the average of initial omega velocity and final omega velocity?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
maniacp08 said:
When a turntable rotating at 33 1/3 rev/min is shut off, it comes to rest in 26 s. Assume constant angular acceleration.
(a) Find the angular acceleration.
rad/s2

(b) Find the average angular velocity of the turntable.
rad/s

(c) Find the number of revolutions it makes before stopping.
rev

For Part A I did:
omega = omega initial + alpha * t
omega = alpha * t
omega/t = alpha

(33.3 rev/min) / (26s) * (2Pi rad) / (1 rev) * (1 min) /(60s)
= .1341218402 rad/s^2 = approx .13 rad/s^2
but this is wrong.

For Part C:
displacement = omega initial + 1/2 alpha * t^2
= 1/2(.1341218402 rad/s^2)(26s)^2
=45.33318199 approx = 45 revolutions.

For Part B is it taking the average of initial omega velocity and final omega velocity?


Isn't acceleration negative? (V goes to 0.)

Your equation for c) yields radians not revolutions.

b) yes. Initial angular velocity over 2.
 
Hmm, I put -.13 rad/s^2 but it was still wrong and as for part C I calculated to approx 71 revolutions and it was wrong. what else I did wrong?

Initial angular velocity / 2
initial angular velocity is = angular acc. * 1s correct?
 
maniacp08 said:
Hmm, I put -.13 rad/s^2 but it was still wrong and as for part C I calculated to approx 71 revolutions and it was wrong. what else I did wrong?

Initial angular velocity / 2
initial angular velocity is = angular acc. * 1s correct?

33.33 = 100/3
My calculation for angular acceleration is w = 2*π*f = 2*π*100/(3*60)

Since w = a*t => a = w/t = 2*π*100/(3*60*26) = -.13426 r/s2

Total radians = 1/2*a*t2 = 45.38 radians

Revolutions = radians/(2*π) = 7.22 revolutions

It couldn't have been 71 revolutions because it only was going 33/min. At full speed it can't be over 33/2 since 26 sec is < 1/2 min.

w = 3.49 rad/s and half is 1.75 rad/sec
 
Oh, I guess I should've put more decimal places rather than just -.13 rad/s^2
and for part B, you are right it was 7.22, I saw it as 72.

Thanks for the clarification!
 
maniacp08 said:
Oh, I guess I should've put more decimal places rather than just -.13 rad/s^2
and for part B, you are right it was 7.22, I saw it as 72.

Thanks for the clarification!

Not sure what the number of significant digits are for your teacher. Perhaps there is something from class?

They ask for rad/sec2 and that has to be a small fractional number.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
973
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K