Why is non-collinear momentum not considered in this analysis?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a problem involving the dissociation of deuterium into a proton and neutron using a gamma photon, focusing on the minimum photon energy required under different scenarios. The subject area includes concepts of binding energy, momentum conservation, and particle physics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to calculate the minimum photon energy required for two scenarios: one where both particles move collinearly and another where the neutron remains stationary. Questions are raised about the implications of non-collinear momentum and its conservation.

Discussion Status

Participants are engaging with the original poster's calculations and reasoning. Some have provided clarifications regarding the binding energy and its relation to kinetic energy, while others are seeking further explanation on the reasoning behind the non-consideration of non-collinear momentum.

Contextual Notes

There is an ongoing discussion about the assumptions made regarding momentum conservation in the analysis, particularly in the context of non-collinear scenarios. The original poster expresses uncertainty about their approach and seeks validation from others.

matt222
Messages
130
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A Gamma photon is used in order to dissociate deuterium into a proton and neutron. the binding energy is 2.22Mev anf the rest energies for the proton and neutron are 938Mev and 939Mev respectively. determine the minmum photon energy to achieve this. consider two cases:
1- both proton and neutron acquire collinear equal velocities parallel to the photon momentum
2-the neutron stays staionary after the collission
3- why non-collinear not considered in this analysis


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



my answer for 1:

Binding energy= (total number of proton and neutron)- minimum photon energy

2.22=939+938-E(MINIMUM)

E(MINIMUM)=1874.78Mev

for part 2:

since the neutron is stationary so this mean we have a zero energy for neutron and we will left only with proton energy and the minimum photon energy in this case would be:

E(MINIMUM)=939-2.22=936.78Mev

for part 3:

for non-collinear this is because the momentum is not conserved
 
Physics news on Phys.org
no one have an idea for my Q if i am on the wr8 track o not
 
59 viewers no one can help me
 
Hi matt222,

I believe the binding energy is equal to the difference in rest mass between the combined proton+neutron and the separated proton and neutron. An energy of 2.22 MeV is required to separate the proton and neutron. If the energy added were exactly equal to the binding energy, then the proton and neutron would end up with zero kinetic energy.

However, in this case, with a high energy photon causing the separation, more than just energy needs to be conserved. What does that mean the minimum photon energy needs to be?
 
binding energy can also be the minimum energy required to decompose a molecule, an atom, or a nucleus into its components. So I agree with alphysicist.
 
matt222,

For your answer to part 3: Could you explain your reasoning more fully? What leads you to that conclusion?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
8K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
8K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K