Why is Q=q^{N} only valid for distinguishable particles?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The partition function Q is expressed as Q=q^{N}, which is valid exclusively for distinguishable particles. This relationship arises because each particle occupies available states independently, leading to a probability distribution that is the product of individual distributions. In contrast, quantum particles, such as bosons and fermions, do not follow this rule due to their indistinguishable nature, which alters the calculation of probabilities. The discussion clarifies the implications of this distinction, particularly in the context of classical versus quantum statistical mechanics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of statistical mechanics concepts
  • Familiarity with partition functions in thermodynamics
  • Knowledge of distinguishable versus indistinguishable particles
  • Basic principles of quantum mechanics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the partition function in classical statistical mechanics
  • Explore the differences between bosons and fermions in quantum statistics
  • Learn about the implications of indistinguishability in quantum mechanics
  • Investigate applications of partition functions in thermodynamic systems
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those focused on statistical mechanics, thermodynamics, and quantum mechanics, will benefit from this discussion.

luitzen
Messages
47
Reaction score
0
The probability of finding the system in microscopic state [itex]i[/itex] is:
[itex]p_{i}=\dfrac{1}{Q}e^{-\beta E_{i}}[/itex]

Where [itex]Q[/itex] is the partition function.

Assumption: molecule [itex]n[/itex] occupies the [itex]i_{n}[/itex]th molecular state (every molecule is a system).

The total energy becomes:
[itex]E_{i_{1},i_{2},...,i_{N}}=\epsilon_{i_{1}}+ \epsilon_{i_{2}}+...+\epsilon_{i_{N}}[/itex]

[itex]Q=\underset{i_{1},i_{2},...,i_{N}}{\sum}e^{-\beta\left(\epsilon_{i_{1}}+ \epsilon_{i_{2}}+...+\epsilon_{i_{N}}\right)}[/itex]

[itex]=\underset{q}{\underbrace{\left(\underset{i_{1}} {\sum} e^{-\beta e_{i_{1}}}\right)}}\times\left(\underset{i_{2}} {\sum} e^{-\beta\epsilon_{i_{2}}}\right)\times...\times\left(\underset{i_{N}}{\sum}e^{-\beta\epsilon_{i_{N}}}\right)[/itex]

Where [itex]q[/itex] is the molecular or particle partition function.

The partition function becomes [itex]Q=q^{N}[/itex] . This is valid for distinguishable particles only (why?).

The probability of finding molecule [itex]n[/itex] in molecular state [itex]i'_{n}[/itex] is obtained by summing over all system-states subject to the condition that [itex]n[/itex] is in [itex]i'_{n}[/itex]

[itex]p_{i'_{n}}=\dfrac{1}{Q}\underset{i_{1},i_{2},...,i_{N}}{\sum}\delta_{i_{n},i'_{n}}e^{-\beta\left(\epsilon_{i_{1}}+ \epsilon_{i_{2}}+...+ \epsilon_{i_{N}}\right)}=\dfrac{1}{Q}e^{-\beta\epsilon_{i'_{n}}}q^{N-1}=\dfrac{1}{q}e^{-\beta\epsilon_{i'_{n}}}[/itex]

So why is [itex]Q=q^{N}[/itex] only true when the particles are distinguishable and what does it mean when it is stated that "the probability of finding molecule [itex]n[/itex] in molecular state [itex]i'_{n}[/itex] is obtained by summing over all system-states subject to the condition that [itex]n[/itex] is in [itex]i'_{n}[/itex]"
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Q = qN says that each particle occupies the available states independently of the others, thus the overall probability distribution is the product of the individual probability distributions. This is true for classical (distinguishable) particles but not for quantum (indistinguishable) particles.

For example consider how two particles 1, 2 would occupy two states A, B, and suppose that εA = εB so we may ignore the exponentials. For distinguishable particles the individual probabilities are 1/2, independently, so the probability of finding both particles in state A is 1/4. And likewise 1/4 for both in state B. But finding one in A and one in B can happen two ways, so the probability of that is 1/2. By contrast, boson states are counted by occupation number so there are three equally like cases: both in A, both in B or one in each. For fermions there is only one possibility: one in A and one in B.
 
Thanks for clarifying. I now fully understand it.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
8K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K