Why is the Cartesian Product S×T Empty When T is Empty?

  • Thread starter Thread starter rmiller70015
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Set Theoretical
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
6 replies · 2K views
rmiller70015
Messages
110
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


Let S be any set and T = ∅. What can you say about the set S×T?

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


The solution is that S×T=∅. I'm not quite sure why this is though. Is it because there isn't anything in T to give an ordered pair so S×T is empty?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
rmiller70015 said:

Homework Statement


Let S be any set and T = ∅. What can you say about the set S×T?

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


The solution is that S×T=∅. I'm not quite sure why this is though. Is it because there isn't anything in T to give an ordered pair so S×T is empty?

Well, when we write out the definition of AxB, we have:

AxB = {(a,b) | a ∈ A and b ∈ B}

Now, apply this to your set, what do you notice?
 
Math_QED said:
Well, when we write out the definition of AxB, we have:

AxB = {(a,b) | a ∈ A and b ∈ B}

Now, apply this to your set, what do you notice?
There is no element t for the set T. And the set theoretical product does not make sense. Except for (∅,∅).
 
rmiller70015 said:
There is no element t for the set T. And the set theoretical product does not make sense. Except for (∅,∅).

Let SxT = {(s,t)|s ∈ S and t ∈ T}
Suppose that SxT ≠ ∅...

Try to find a contradiction, then follows that S x T = ∅
 
Math_QED said:
Let SxT = {(s,t)|s ∈ S and t ∈ T}
Suppose that SxT ≠ ∅...

Try to find a contradiction, then follows that S x T = ∅
Ok thank you, that makes sense.