Cartesian Product of two sets?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the Cartesian product of two sets, specifically A = [1,2) ∪ {3} and B = {1, (1/2), (1/3), ...} ∪ [-2,-1). The original poster seeks assistance in graphing the resulting set S = A x B.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss how to represent the intervals and points from sets A and B on a graph. There are attempts to clarify the nature of the elements in A and B, and how they combine in the Cartesian product.

Discussion Status

Some participants are providing feedback on the original poster's sketches, suggesting that they are on the right track but may need further verification. There is an acknowledgment of uncertainty regarding the accuracy of the graphs presented.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the original poster may benefit from reviewing class notes or seeking input from mentors for additional guidance. There are also observations about specific details in the graph that may not be accurately represented.

DanielJackins
Messages
39
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I need to answer a bunch of topological questions based on the cartesian product of two sets, but I'm not entirely sure how to graph them out.

I have A = [1,2)U{3} and B = {1, (1/2), (1/3), ...}U[-2,-1). S = A x B, and I need the graph of S.

Could anyone help me with this?

The Attempt at a Solution



This is my original "sketch" but I'm almost positive it is wrong. http://i.imgur.com/NqOSnkh.jpg
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Set up the interval [1,2) and the 3 along the x-axis. In a sense A is a set with 1 element -- a strange element but just one.

Set up the interval [-2,-1) along the y-axis.

I think each element of A X B will be those two intervals, plus the point (3,1/n). If that makes sense, it is easy enough to graph.
 
I'm sure you are closing in on this and you may be right. I am not sure. I am far from expert at this kind of thing, so you probably need a more reliable opinion.

You might look thru your class notes to see if anything similar was mentioned. Or perhaps one of the mentors would look this over.
 
DanielJackins said:
Would it be like this? I think I've got it.


http://i.imgur.com/TxF7bae.jpg
Yes, that's it. The box you have in the 2nd quadrant threw me off for a bit, but I see that this is not actually part of your graph.

Some fine points that your graph doesn't show:

The horizontal lines in the 1st quadrant get closer and closer together as the y values get closer to 0.
The points that you show in the 1st quadrant do the same thing.

Your graph shows (correctly) that the rectangular region in Q IV includes the left and bottom edges, but does not include the top and right edges.

Your graph also shows (correctly) that the vertical line segment in Q IV includes the lowest point, but not the highest one.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
14K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
8K