Why is the coefficient of y important in finding the series for ln(1+x)?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Miike012
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Series
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around understanding the significance of the coefficient of y in the series expansion for ln(1+x). Participants explore the relationship between the series (1+x)^y and its implications for deriving the logarithmic series.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the importance of focusing on the coefficient of y, questioning how coefficients for higher powers of y relate to the logarithmic function. There are inquiries about the steps taken to derive the series for ln(1+x) from the binomial expansion.

Discussion Status

Some participants express understanding of the relationship between the two series and how coefficients can be equated. Others suggest alternative methods, such as integrating the geometric series, while noting the complexity of the current approach.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of the appropriateness of the problem's placement in the pre-calculus section, with some participants questioning the level of complexity involved in the derivation of the series.

Miike012
Messages
1,009
Reaction score
0
In the paint document (the blue highlighted portion) why are we only interested in the coefficient of y?

(Looking at the red portion) What steps did they go through to go from series (1) of (1+x)y to the series ln(1+x)?
 

Attachments

  • S.jpg
    S.jpg
    26.4 KB · Views: 472
Physics news on Phys.org
If we considered the coefficient of y2, then we'd have to equate that coefficient to

\frac{1}{2}\left(\log_ex\right)^2

And for the coefficient of y3, we'd have the log raised to the 3rd power etc. But we're interested in finding a taylor expansion for simply logex, which requires that we compare the coefficients of y.

And I can't quite grasp what you're asking in your second question...

Do you understand how they found the coefficient of y in the binomial expansion?
 
Mentallic said:
If we considered the coefficient of y2, then we'd have to equate that coefficient to

\frac{1}{2}\left(\log_ex\right)^2Do you understand how they found the coefficient of y in the binomial expansion?

From series (2): (1+x)y = 1 + yx + y(y-1)/2! x^2 + ...

The coeff. of the first term is 0.
second term is x
third term: y(y-1)/2! x2 = y2x2 /2! - yx2 /2!... The coeff. of y from the third term is -x2 /2!..

Is that what they did?

Then what did they do next to get arrive to loge(x+1) = x - x2/2! +...
 
Last edited:
deleted
 
Miike012 said:
From series (2): (1+x)y = 1 + yx + y(y-1)/2! x^2 + ...

The coeff. of the first term is 0.
second term is x
third term: y(y-1)/2! x2 = y2x2 /2! - yx2 /2!... The coeff. of y from the third term is -x2 /2!..

Is that what they did?

Yes.

Miike012 said:
Then what did they do next to get arrive to loge(x+1) = x - x2/2! +...

We essentially have these two series:

(1+x)^y=a_0(x)+a_1(x)y+a_2(x)y^2+...
and
(1+x)^y=b_0(x)+b_1(x)y+b_2(x)y^2+...

hence we can equate each series since they're both equal to (1+x)y so we get

a_0(x)+a_1(x)y+a_2(x)y^2+...= b_0(x)+b_1(x)y+b_2(x)y^2+...

Now, for these two series to be exactly equivalent, the coefficient of y0, y1,y2,... must all be equal, hence we have that

a_0(x)=b_0(x)
a_1(x)=b_1(x)
etc.

and since for series (1) we had a_1(x)=\log_ea then this must be equal to b_1(x) which is the y coefficient of the binomial expansion which you just found.
 
Mentallic said:
Yes.



We essentially have these two series:

(1+x)^y=a_0(x)+a_1(x)y+a_2(x)y^2+...
and
(1+x)^y=b_0(x)+b_1(x)y+b_2(x)y^2+...

hence we can equate each series since they're both equal to (1+x)y so we get

a_0(x)+a_1(x)y+a_2(x)y^2+...= b_0(x)+b_1(x)y+b_2(x)y^2+...

Now, for these two series to be exactly equivalent, the coefficient of y0, y1,y2,... must all be equal, hence we have that

a_0(x)=b_0(x)
a_1(x)=b_1(x)
etc.

and since for series (1) we had a_1(x)=\log_ea then this must be equal to b_1(x) which is the y coefficient of the binomial expansion which you just found.

I think I understand now...

From series (2) we have:
1 + yx + y(y-1)x2/2! + ... = 1 + y(x - x2/2! + x3/3! - ...) +y2*f(x) + ...

From series (1) and (2) we have:
yloge(1+x) = y(x - x2/2! + x3/3! - ...)
and
loge(1+x) = (x - x2/2! + x3/3! - ...)

Thanks I got it
And from series (1) and (2) I can also calculate loge(1+x)n where n = 1,2,3,4,...
 
Miike012 said:
I think I understand now...

From series (2) we have:
1 + yx + y(y-1)x2/2! + ... = 1 + y(x - x2/2! + x3/3! - ...) +y2*f(x) + ...

From series (1) and (2) we have:
yloge(1+x) = y(x - x2/2! + x3/3! - ...)
and
loge(1+x) = (x - x2/2! + x3/3! - ...)

Thanks I got it

I'm glad to see that :smile:

Miike012 said:
And from series (1) and (2) I can also calculate loge(1+x)n where n = 1,2,3,4,...

Yes, or depending on your situation, you can even calculate it by just taking the nth power of the expansion of loge(1+x).
 
Why is this in the pre-calculus section? As far as I understand it the argument uses the very complicated idea to use the exponential series and then compare coefficients. You start from
(1+x)^y=\exp[y \ln(1+x)]=\sum_{n=0}^{\infty} \frac{[y \ln(1+x)]^n}{n!}.
Thus the coefficient for n=1 in this expansion in powers of y is just \ln(1+x).

On the other hand the direct series expansion in powers of x gives
(1+x)^y=1+y x+\frac{1}{2} y(y-1) x^2 + \frac{1}{3!} y(y-1)(y-2) x^3+\ldots=\sum_{k=0}^{\infty} \binom{y}{k} x^k.
Now you need to sort out the coefficient in front of the first power of y, which is an infinite series. The coefficient in front of the kth power of x is
\binom{y}{k}:=\frac{y(y-1)(y-2)\cdots (y-k+1)}{k!}=y \frac{(y-1)(y-2)\cdots(y-k+1)}{k!}.
Thus when multiplying out the numerator in the last expression, you see that only the terms without any factor of y contributes. This coefficient is easily identified, and you get the correct series for \ln(1+x).

Of course, this is way to complicated. Since you need calculus anyway you can as well start from the geometric series
\frac{1}{1+x}=\sum_{k=0}^{\infty} (-1)^k x^k
and integrate. Within the interior of the convergence interval of the series, (-1,1) you are allowed to do this integration piecewise for the series, and thus you find very easily the series by using
\ln(1+z)=\int_0^z \mathrm{d x} \frac{1}{1+x}, \quad z \in(-1,1).
 
You should follow what vanhees has advised about using ##\frac{1}{1+x}## to find your series. After you integrate within the interval of convergence, you should check the endpoints to see if your new series converges there. ln(x+1) will indeed converge at one of the endpoints.
 
  • #10
Also, when you do integrate the Geometric Series do not forget to check what the integration constant should be!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K