Why Is the Derivative of Potential Energy Considered Force?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The derivative of potential energy, represented as F = -dU/dx, defines the force acting on a mass m within a potential field. The potential energy function discussed is U(x) = U0 * (a/x + x/a - 2), and the force derived from this function is F = U0(-1/a + a/x^2). The negative sign in the equation indicates that the force acts in the direction of decreasing potential energy, aligning with physical reality. Understanding this relationship is crucial for grasping concepts of work and power in physics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of calculus, specifically derivatives
  • Familiarity with potential energy concepts, including gravitational potential energy U = mgh
  • Knowledge of force and work relationships in physics
  • Basic understanding of units in physics, such as joules and watts
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the relationship between work and power, specifically P = dW/dt
  • Explore different forms of potential energy, such as U = (1/2)kx^2 for spring systems
  • Learn about the implications of the negative sign in force equations
  • Investigate the physical interpretation of derivatives in the context of motion and forces
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, particularly those studying mechanics, as well as educators and anyone seeking to deepen their understanding of the relationship between potential energy, force, and power.

transgalactic
Messages
1,386
Reaction score
0
the potential energy of a body which mass is "m"
and which is moving in one demention is given by:

U(x)=U0 * (a/x + x/a -2)
what is the power which being put on the body

the solution says F=-dU/dx=U0(-1/a + a/x^2)

which means that they are doing a derivative to the original expression.

but i can't understand why the derivative of potential energy is its power.

from high school i know the potential energy is U=m*g*h

and the only derivative that i know is for a(t)=v'(t) v(t)=x'(t)

so their solution is not logic to me at all

?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
transgalactic said:
the potential energy of a body which mass is "m"
and which is moving in one demention is given by:

U(x)=U0 * (a/x + x/a -2)
what is the power which being put on the body

the solution says F=-dU/dx=U0(-1/a + a/x^2)

which means that they are doing a derivative to the original expression.

but i can't understand why the derivative of potential energy is its power.

U(x) is a scalar function for potential. F=-dU/dx gives the force on the particle, not the power.

Look at the units of your quantities. A force applied over some distance is the "work" done on the particle; this has units of joules. Now, the work done over some time period is the power; P = dW/dt, which has units of joules per seconds. So, yes, something does seem quite strange if that is what your text is telling you.

transgalactic said:
from high school i know the potential energy is U=m*g*h

and the only derivative that i know is for a(t)=v'(t) v(t)=x'(t)

so their solution is not logic to me at all

?

Potential energy comes in many different forms. U=mgh is the gravitational potential energy for an object some height above Earth's surface. Another example is U=(1/2)kx^2, which is the potential energy of a mass-spring system. Your function U(x) is just some general function for a potential energy; for this problem, it appears that it is not overly important for you to know what type of potential energy it is, but rather, that by taking the derivative with respect to x, you can determine the force on the mass m at any position x where the potential is defined.
 
ok i understand that the force which is applied on
is the derivative of U(x)

but the definition of a derivative is dU/dx

why are they writing F=-dU/dx (why they add minus)

??
 
The minus sign is just a convention.

Consider a particle of mass m confined within the potential U(x) = x^2. The force on the particle is given by F=-dU/dx, right? Thus, F = -2x. Suppose that the particle is located at x=a with no initial kinetic energy. What is the force on the particle and its direction? F=-2a and the force acts to push the particle to the left, and down the "hill" (parabola). If there were no minus sign in front of dU/dx, then the force would act to push the particle to the right and into regions of higher potential. The minus sign convention seems to offer a better description in regards to physical reality.
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
760
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K