Why is the distance calculation multiplied by one half in this physics problem?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter mapa
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the reasoning behind the factor of one half in the distance calculation for uniformly accelerated motion in physics. Participants explore various mathematical and conceptual explanations related to this factor, including algebraic and calculus-based approaches.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants explain that the factor of one half arises from considering the average velocity of an object under constant acceleration, using the formula for average velocity as v_{av} = (v_0 + v) / 2.
  • Others mention that the derivation of the distance formula can be approached through calculus, although some argue that it can also be understood through algebra.
  • One participant illustrates the concept using a graphical representation of velocity over time, noting that the area under the curve represents distance and forms a triangle, leading to the area calculation of 1/2 * base * height.
  • Several participants provide numerical examples to clarify how the average speed relates to the distance traveled, particularly emphasizing that the argument holds when the initial speed is zero.
  • A later reply cautions that the reasoning about average speed only applies when starting from rest, indicating a condition for the argument's validity.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express various viewpoints on the reasoning behind the factor of one half, with some supporting algebraic explanations and others favoring calculus. There is no consensus on a single explanation, and the discussion remains open to multiple interpretations.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes assumptions about initial conditions, such as starting from rest, which may limit the applicability of certain arguments. Additionally, the reliance on calculus for a deeper understanding is noted, but not all participants have reached that level of study.

mapa
Messages
29
Reaction score
0
When I learn physics I like to visualize what is happening in my head.
I can understand why this problem is multiplied by t^2; from my rational
it is to get (m/s^2) just to meters. But why is this equation multiplied by
one half? I do not understand why this happens. Can someone please explain
the reasoning behind this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
mapa said:
When I learn physics I like to visualize what is happening in my head.
I can understand why this problem is multiplied by t^2; from my rational
it is to get (m/s^2) just to meters. But why is this equation multiplied by
one half? I do not understand why this happens. Can someone please explain
the reasoning behind this?

There are a couple of reasons that could be given. One involves calculus. More simply though, you can just use algebra. You know that for constant acceleration in one dimension:

v = v_0 + at

v_{av} = \dfrac{v_0 + v}{2}

Now, if you have a body that accelerates but has a known average velocity, then its displacement is:

x = x_0 + v_{av}t

So, you can plug in the average velocity formula:

x = x_0 + \dfrac{v_0 + v}{2}t

But since we're considering constant acceleration, we can substitute the equation for v and get:

x = x_0 + \dfrac{v_0 + (v_0 + at)}{2}t

x = x_0 + \dfrac{2v_0 + at}{2}t

And finally, after distributing, we end up with the familiar position function formula:

x = x_0 + v_0t + \dfrac{1}{2}at^2

If you just set the initial position and velocity equal to zero, this reduces to the equation you cited. So you can see that the factor of 1/2 comes because we can conside the average velocity of a moving body by simply taking half the sum of its initial and present velocities.
 
Many first Physics courses do not show the math behind the formulas, you just have to take them as presented and learn to use them. When you get some more math under your belt, specifically calculus the equations you have memorized will be derived.

The answer to your question is calculus. Since clearly you are not there yet we cannot explain very well. At present your observation that it makes the units work is an excellent one. Keep seeing things like that and you do well.
 
Integral said:
The answer to your question is calculus. Since clearly you are not there yet we cannot explain very well.

Though there are many places in physics where calculus is indispensable, (e.g., deriving the electric potential from Coloumb's law), this doesn't happen to be one of them. In fact, arunma answered the OP nicely:

arunma said:
You know that for constant acceleration in one dimension:
...
v_{av} = \dfrac{v_0 + v}{2}
...
So you can see that the factor of 1/2 comes because we can consider the average velocity of a moving body by simply taking half the sum of its initial and present velocities.

This is worth understanding because it will come up again at least twice. First in the definition of kinetic energy, \frac12 mv^2, and second in the potential energy of a spring, \frac12 kx^2.
 
mapa said:
I like to visualize what is happening in my head.
OK, let's show you :)

When you imagine v(t) graph, distans is representing as an area under the curve.

In motion with constans velocity it is clear: v(t) is horizontal line and s=v*t (see picture below)

In uniformly accelerated linear motion v(t)=a*t, so each point have coordinates (t, a*t).

Then area under the curve it triangle. Area of the triangle equals 1/2*a*h where a is the length of the base of the triangle, and h is the height or altitude of the triangle.

In this case s=1/2*t*(a*t) = 1/2*a*t^2 (see image)

regards
 

Attachments

  • droga_w_ruchu.jpg
    droga_w_ruchu.jpg
    14.3 KB · Views: 3,754
Last edited:
If you're accelerating at 10m/s^2 for 1 second: in that one second, you started out going 0m/s and you ended up going 10m/s. Your average speed would be right in between, at 5m/s.

If your average speed is 5m/s for 1 second...your distance is 5m. And there's your half.
 
Lsos said:
If you're accelerating at 10m/s^2 for 1 second: in that one second, you started out going 0m/s and you ended up going 10m/s. Your average speed would be right in between, at 5m/s.

If your average speed is 5m/s for 1 second...your distance is 5m. And there's your half.

This is helpful, but be careful: this argument only works when the initial speed is zero.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 48 ·
2
Replies
48
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K