Why is the formula for lithium nitride Li3N and not Li2N2?

  • Thread starter Thread starter alingy1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Formula Lithium
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The chemical formula for lithium nitride is Li3N due to the valence of lithium and nitrogen, where lithium has a valence of +1 and nitrogen commonly has a valence of -3. This results in three lithium atoms combining with one nitrogen atom to achieve a stable compound. The formula Li2N2 is not viable because it does not balance the charges correctly, leading to an unstable configuration. Understanding the principles of atomic valence and molecular stability is essential for grasping why certain compounds form while others do not.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of atomic valence and bonding principles
  • Familiarity with Lewis structures and molecular geometry
  • Knowledge of basic chemical nomenclature
  • Concept of molecular stability and energy minimization
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the concept of atomic valence in detail
  • Learn about Lewis structures and their limitations
  • Explore molecular stability and energy minimization techniques
  • Investigate the nomenclature of molecular compounds and elemental gases
USEFUL FOR

Chemistry students, educators, and anyone interested in understanding molecular formation and chemical bonding principles.

alingy1
Messages
325
Reaction score
0
We have to give the formula for lithium nitride.

I know the answer is Li3N. But, I do not understand why it is not Li2N2. I drew the lewis structure and there is a way to arrange that molecule. Why don't we specify with the prefixes the number of atoms trilithium nitride?

In a same way, why does CO2 exist, but not C2O4. I know about oxalate. But, why does it need 2- charge when it could form a molecule without those two other electrons?

I feel like I am forgetting a fundamental concept. Please help me. I feel like 2+2=/=4 anymore :S
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm also wondering about F2, Cl2 and O2.

Do we call them difluorine, dichlorine and dioxygen? I never heard that. But, how do we then distinguish oxygen (O) from O2?
 
Well, CO is carbon MONoxide and CO2 is carbon DIoxide.

H2O could be called DIhydrogen MONoxide, but 'water' is just fine.

C has a valence of 4. Oxygen has a valence of 2. Ordinarily, burning carbon would produce CO2. When carbon is burned where there is insufficient oxygen, CO is formed instead of CO2. Carbon is capable of forming compounds with single, double, or triple bonds. Carbon monoxide has a triple bond, so its structure is: C \equiv O

Lithium has a valence of 1, while nitrogen can have multiple valences (3 is a common valence for nitrogen). It takes 3 Li atoms and 1 nitrogen atom to make lithium nitride, Li3N. Li2N2 doesn't form because the valences are out of whack [+2 for the 2 lithium atoms, -6 for the 2 nitrogen atoms].

The valence of different atoms usually controls how many of each form a given compound. Perhaps this is the chemical principle you are overlooking.
 
alingy1 said:
I'm also wondering about F2, Cl2 and O2.

Do we call them difluorine, dichlorine and dioxygen? I never heard that. But, how do we then distinguish oxygen (O) from O2?

All elemental gases (except for the noble gases) form molecules in the pure state. These atoms do this so they can share valence electrons. So F2 is a molecule of fluorine gas, Cl2 is a molecule of chlorine gas, and O2 is a molecule of oxygen gas. A single O, for instance, is just an oxygen atom.
 
Welcome to chemistry :wink:

Just because you can draw a Lewis structure (most likely linking N=N) doesn't mean such a molecule will exist. There is no simple rule that will help here - other than "apart from carbon, most elements don't create chains in typical molecules". But there are plenty of counterexamples, so even this rule doesn't have to work always.

Seriously, problem is, at the beginning you are trying to learn several simplified rules that will help you deal with the most basic compounds. These rules have to be simplified, but as they are simplified, they work only for a small subset of compounds. And the world around is freaking complicated, it doesn't want to be described by simple rules. Even complicating these rules doesn't help much. The most general rules are those saying something around the lines "this is a way atoms arrange to obtain minimum energy". We even know methods to calculate this minimum energy, but it is not something that you can do with a pen and paper (unless for an isolated hydrogen atom), you need fast computer and sophisticated software for that. And even then sometimes the reality shows the middle finger - which only makes our efforts to understand what is going on more interesting!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
5K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
7K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
8K
Replies
12
Views
5K