A Why Is the Hamiltonian Approach Preferred for the Restricted Three Body Problem?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion highlights challenges in finding papers that derive the equations of motion for the Restricted Three Body Problem (RTBP) using Newtonian mechanics, particularly for the ERTBP. The Hamiltonian and Lagrangian approaches are preferred due to their simplicity in focusing on system energies, making them easier to apply. In contrast, the Newtonian method requires more complex setup involving positions, momentum, and forces. A video is mentioned that demonstrates both Newtonian and Lagrangian methods, illustrating the differences in approach. Overall, the preference for the Hamiltonian approach is linked to its efficiency in analysis.
slyrice
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
TL;DR Summary
What are the advantages and disadvantages to the Newtonian and Hamiltonian approach to the Elliptical Restricted Three Body Problem (ERTBP) ?
I am having a difficult time finding papers that derive the equations of motions of the Restricted Three Body Problem using Newtonian mechanics. I have found some (barely) for the CRTBP, but there are none on the ERTBP.

Does it depend on what is being studied within the problem that the Hamiltonian approach is the preferred?Thank you!
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
The Hamiltonian or Lagrangian approach is used because its simpler dealing only with the energies of the system.

The Newtonian method is far harder to setup properly.There's a fair amount of labeling and keeping track of postions, momentum and forces.

Here's a video where the presenter uses Newtonian methods initially:




and uses python to simulate the system.

In contrast, this presenter uses the Lagrangian methods:

 
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Today at about 4:30 am I saw the conjunction of Venus and Jupiter, where they were about the width of the full moon, or one half degree apart. Did anyone else see it? Edit: The moon is 2,200 miles in diameter and at a distance of 240,000 miles. Thereby it subtends an angle in radians of 2,200/240,000=.01 (approximately). With pi radians being 180 degrees, one radian is 57.3 degrees, so that .01 radians is about .50 degrees (angle subtended by the moon). (.57 to be more exact, but with...
Back
Top