Why is the height of the table not necessary to solve this problem?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on solving a projectile motion problem involving a spring gun mounted on a table, where the target is on the floor. Participants clarify that the height of the table is irrelevant to the solution, emphasizing an algebraic approach using symbols instead of numbers. The key equations discussed include the work-energy principle, W = FΔd, and the relationship between velocity and distance, v = d/t. The consensus is that understanding the direction of force relative to displacement is crucial for solving the problem.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of projectile motion principles
  • Familiarity with the work-energy theorem
  • Knowledge of algebraic manipulation of equations
  • Basic concepts of force and displacement in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the work-energy theorem in detail
  • Learn about projectile motion equations and their applications
  • Explore algebraic methods for solving physics problems
  • Investigate the role of force direction in work calculations
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in physics, particularly those focusing on mechanics and projectile motion, as well as anyone looking to enhance their problem-solving skills in physics using algebraic methods.

jolly_math
Messages
51
Reaction score
5
Homework Statement
Two children are playing a game in which they try to hit a small box on the floor with a marble fired from a spring-loaded gun that is mounted on a table. The target box is 2.20 m horizontally from the edge of the table. Bobby compresses the spring 1.10 cm, but the marble falls 27.0 cm short. How far should Rhoda compress the spring to score a hit?
Relevant Equations
U(x) = (1/2)kx^2
KE = (1/2)mv^2
Ki + Ui = Kf + Uf
1/2)kx2 = (1/2)mvf2, but W = (1/2)mvf2 = F∆d, so
1/2)kx^2 = F∆d.

The solution says that I should just substitute v as d/t. But could anyone explain why my reasoning is wrong? Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Which force is this that does the work W = FΔd? What is the direction of F relative to the direction of the displacement Δd? This is a projectile motion problem where you need to find the initial speed of the projectile needed to hit the target. Then you must match that speed to the spring compression.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: topsquark and Lnewqban
So, I'm taking it that the spring gun must be horizontal, and the target has no vertical dimension ( physical size)?
 
Last edited:
erobz said:
So, I'm taking it that the spring gun must be horizontal, and the target has no vertical dimension?
1666651983080.png

This is the diagram. I just assumed there was no vertical dimension, as the solution didn't consider it and I'm not sure how to calculate it otherwise.
 
jolly_math said:
View attachment 316004
This is the diagram. I just assumed there was no vertical dimension, as the solution didn't consider it and I'm not sure how to calculate it otherwise.
That is the only configuration I could find a solution for with the information given.

Have you worked it out the approach yet?
 
jolly_math said:
View attachment 316004
This is the diagram. I just assumed there was no vertical dimension, as the solution didn't consider it and I'm not sure how to calculate it otherwise.
The problem states that the gun is mounted on a table and that the target is on the floor. You don't need the height of the table to solve this problem. I strongly suggest that you adopt an algebraic approach, i.e. use symbols and not numbers when you write equations. Don't worry if you don't have numbers for the symbols. It will all come out in the wash.
 
kuruman said:
The problem states that the gun is mounted on a table and that the target is on the floor. You don't need the height of the table to solve this problem. I strongly suggest that you adopt an algebraic approach, i.e. use symbols and not numbers when you write equations. Use symbols for unknown quantities and don't worry if you don't have numbers for them. It will all come out in the wash.
I was just indicating that a diagram wasn't posted. It was my lack of being able to find a solution for some arbitrary gun angle that led me to conclude that it must be this way.

You don't need the height of the table to solve this problem.
I was talking about the height of the target, as in its physical dimensions. Not where it is located spatially. That was probably confusing, but the OP seemed to understand what I was asking.

Anyhow, It sounds as though the @jolly_math has figured it out.
 

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K