Why Is the Kinetic Energy Equation Equated to eV in Lenard's Experiment?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around Lenard's experiment, which aims to determine the charge-to-mass ratio (e/m) of photoelectrons. The original poster questions why the kinetic energy equation, represented as mv²/2, is equated to eV, where e is the charge of the electron, m is its mass, and V is the applied potential.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the relationship between potential energy and kinetic energy in the context of charged particles in an electric field. Questions arise regarding the conversion of potential energy to kinetic energy and the implications of this relationship in the photoelectric effect.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging in clarifying concepts related to the conversion of energy forms and the conditions under which these relationships hold. Some guidance has been provided regarding the role of voltage in stopping electrons and the significance of the stopping voltage in measuring kinetic energy.

Contextual Notes

There is an emphasis on the conditions necessary for the photoelectric effect to occur, including the need for a minimum frequency of incident light to initiate electron emission. The discussion also touches on the broader implications of energy interactions beyond the photoelectric effect.

logearav
Messages
329
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



In Lenard's experiment to determine e/m for photoelectrons, he puts forwards this equation
mv2/2 = eV,
where e is the charge, m is the mass of photoelectron, and V is the potential applied.
Why the kinetic energy equation is equated to eV? Thanks in advance

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi...
eV is the potential energy of a charged particle in an Electric field.
[itex]U = qV[/itex] irrespective of the Photoelectric effect, and is true for any such system.
In your case, a particle is accelerated/stopped by an electric field; All of the potential energy was converted to the particle's kinetic energy or vice-versa, depending on the case.
Daniel
 
Mr. Daniel,
I got your relation U = qV but i don't understand your line " All of the potential energy was converted to the particle's KE"
Could u please elaborate more?
Why the work done is equated to KE, here?
 
Certainly,
In the scheme for the photoelectric effect, one measures, on top of other things, the voltage needed to thwart the current, this is known as the "Stopping voltage".
In other words, what sort of an electric field must be created(i.e, what's the voltage difference necessary), in order to stop the electrons ejected from the metal being irradiated.
So, all of the kinetic energy the electrons had upon leaving the metal is negated by the work done by the Electric field, and the energy deposited in this process is qV in this case.
The voltage is an alternative way, and a mandatory one, of estimating [itex]K_{max}[/itex], or the energy with which electrons are being emitted. This gave way to the first quantitative assessments of the Photoelectric effect, as done, as you mentioned, by Lenard.

Daniel
 
Thanks Mr. Daniel. So, when potential energy to kinetic energy, no particle will move. Am I right? Does this hold true in all situations?
 
Hi there,
Yes, when the voltage is applied, it is done for the explicit purpose of stopping the charges.
This only works however, naturally, when electrons are actually emitted; Therefore, the photoelectric experiments also require one to derive the minimal frequency, [itex]\nu_0[/itex] needed to start the reaction while the voltage is first set to 0.
In the broader sense, you can look into effects created in the energy spectrum exceeding Photoelectric ranges; Compton scattering is an example, whereby the energy of the incidient photon is large enough for a secondary photon to recoil, and then, there would naturally be no effect on it by the electric field.
Daniel
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K