Why is the parallelogram rule for the addition of forces as it is?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The parallelogram rule for the addition of forces is fundamentally rooted in the linear superposition of forces, ensuring that the application of one force does not interfere with another. This rule, which dates back to at least the first century BC and is documented in Heron's "Mechanics," illustrates how forces can be represented as vectors in a linear vector space. The historical context suggests that the rule emerged from geometric interpretations prevalent during the time of early mathematicians like Stevenus. Current discussions highlight ongoing philosophical inquiries into the logical foundations of vector addition.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of vector addition and linear superposition
  • Familiarity with historical mathematical texts, particularly Heron's "Mechanics"
  • Basic knowledge of geometric representations in mathematics
  • Awareness of the philosophical implications of mathematical rules
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the historical context of Heron's "Mechanics" and its impact on modern physics
  • Explore the concept of linear vector spaces in physics
  • Investigate the philosophical discussions surrounding the foundations of vector addition
  • Study the applications of the parallelogram rule in engineering and physics
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, mathematicians, historians of science, and anyone interested in the foundational principles of force addition and vector analysis.

zexott
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Why is the parallelogram rule for the addition of forces as it is?
I feel it must have some deep origin and pointing to something fundamental. Though I know this problem may have no answer: God design it as such.
But I wonder how the first person came up with this rule, where does his/her intuition come from?
Are there something that addition of forces simply must obey due to logic itself?
Are there active research going on that is investigating this?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Would you accept vector addition as being the logic?
 
It is likely that it arose because, at the time this was being developed, probably at the time of people like Stevens (1548 - 1620) most mathematics was carried out geometrically. So the parallelogram construction was the natural mode of working.
 
Whoops, autocorrect jumped in. I mean Stevenus .
 
Use the Edit button to correct it.
 
All the parallelogram rule does is to enforce that the addition of two vectors actually add their components.
 
Historically it was an observation about ropes. The rule is equivalent assuming the rule of linear superposition of forces ... that is, application of one force does not interfere with any other. This means that forces form a linear vector space.

The rule dates back to at least the first century BC; it appears in Heron's "Mechanics". But it is probably older.

Philosophers have written on it: file:///C:/Users/Peter/Downloads/1548-24248-1-PB.pdf
 
UltrafastPED said:
Historically it was an observation about ropes. The rule is equivalent assuming the rule of linear superposition of forces ... that is, application of one force does not interfere with any other. This means that forces form a linear vector space.

The rule dates back to at least the first century BC; it appears in Heron's "Mechanics". But it is probably older.

Philosophers have written on it: file:///C:/Users/Peter/Downloads/1548-24248-1-PB.pdf

Ah, observation of ropes, that's how their intuition comes. Now it seems conceivable for me. Your information is very detailed and now I guess I can trace it down. Thank you so much! And thank you all for your time and attention!
 
UltrafastPED said:
file:///C:/Users/Peter/Downloads/1548-24248-1-PB.pdf

:smile:
Don't you have a web link?
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
23
Views
5K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K