Why Is the Path Integral W[J] a Vacuum-to-Vacuum Amplitude?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter PGaccount
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Amplitude Vacuum
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the path integral W[J] in quantum field theory, specifically exploring why it is considered a vacuum-to-vacuum amplitude. Participants are examining the theoretical underpinnings, mathematical interpretations, and connections to existing literature.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents the functional integral formulation of W[J] and seeks insight into its interpretation as a vacuum-to-vacuum amplitude.
  • Another participant references Sredinicki's work, suggesting it may contain relevant discussions on the topic.
  • A different participant emphasizes the importance of the "i ε" prescription in understanding W[J] as a vacuum-to-vacuum transition amplitude influenced by the external source J, citing their own manuscript for further explanation.
  • One participant draws an analogy between the partition function and vacuum expectation values, questioning how this relates to the "i ε" prescription mentioned earlier.
  • Another participant proposes a method to interpret an infinite Gaussian integral as a trace, exploring the relationship between matrix elements and path integrals in the context of free field theories.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express various interpretations and approaches to the topic, indicating that multiple competing views remain. There is no consensus on the exact reasoning behind W[J] as a vacuum-to-vacuum amplitude.

Contextual Notes

Some discussions hinge on specific mathematical formulations and assumptions, such as the "i ε" prescription and the interpretation of integrals as traces, which may not be universally accepted or fully resolved.

PGaccount
Messages
85
Reaction score
25
In the functional integral approach to quantum field theory, we have

W[J] = ⟨0+|0-J = ∫ D[Φ] eiS + ∫ JΦ

Can someone give me some insight into why this path integral is a vacuum-to-vacuum amplitude. How and also why does this path integral W[J] become a vev?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Isn't it discussed in Sredinicki's?
 
It is important to carefully take into account the "##\mathrm{i} \epsilon## prescription to understand, why this is the "vacuum-to-vacuum transition amplitude under influence of the external source ##J##". See my QFT manuscript,

https://itp.uni-frankfurt.de/~hees/publ/lect.pdf
In Sect. 1.10 it's explained for ordinary non-relativistic QT of a single particle. It translates easily to the QFT case, which is treated in Sect. 3.5 ff.
 
I guess, because this is the partition function, ##\langle \mathrm{O} \rangle = \int e^{iS} \mathrm{O}## similar to ## \langle \mathrm{O} \rangle = \mathrm{tr \ O \rho}##, we get

$$\langle 0 | 0 \rangle = \int e^{iS}$$

@vanhees71 how does this fit in with what you said about iε?
 
Also, is there a way to interpret the infinite gaussian integral

$$\int dx \ e^{-x^T A x}$$

as a trace? I mean, is it possible to think of ##x^T A x## as a matrix element of A, i.e. ##A_{xx} = \langle x | A | x \rangle##? Then the integral can be written

$$\int dx \ e^{- A_{xx}} = tr \ e^{-A} = \left( \frac{1}{\det \mathrm{A}} \right)^{\frac{1}{2}} $$

Then for free field theories, ##\int e^{iS}## can be written as a trace ##tr \ e^{-A}## where A is the inverse of the propagator. This would make the analogy with ##\langle \ \rangle = tr \rho## and ##\langle \mathrm{O} \rangle = \mathrm{tr O\rho}## exact
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K