Why is the plural for moose not meese?

  • Thread starter Thread starter symbolipoint
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the pluralization of the word "moose" and why it does not follow the same pattern as "goose" and "geese." Participants explore linguistic rules, historical influences on the English language, and the origins of the word "moose." The conversation includes elements of humor and skepticism regarding sources of information.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants reference a web page that discusses why "meese" is not the correct plural for "moose," comparing it to "goose" and "geese."
  • Others humorously suggest that "meeces" could be a playful alternative to "meese."
  • A participant expresses skepticism about the credibility of the web page, suggesting it may be biased due to its association with a product.
  • There is a proposal that the real question is why "geese" is the exception to the regular pluralization rules, rather than focusing solely on "moose."
  • Some participants discuss the evolution of the English language, noting its influences from Old Norse, Latin, and German, and how this affects pluralization.
  • One participant points out that "moose" originates from an Algonquin word, which may explain its irregular pluralization.
  • Another participant elaborates on historical linguistic changes that affected plural forms in English, suggesting that "moose" was introduced after these changes occurred.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a variety of viewpoints, with some agreeing on the historical influences on English and the origins of "moose," while others debate the nature of pluralization rules and the credibility of sources. No consensus is reached regarding the best explanation for the pluralization of "moose."

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes references to linguistic history and the evolution of English, but participants do not fully resolve the complexities of pluralization rules or the implications of the word's origins. Some assumptions about language evolution and plural forms remain unexamined.

symbolipoint
Homework Helper
Education Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
7,643
Reaction score
2,081
The piece came-up from the "Lame Jokes" section of the forum. Someobody carried a step from one of the posts and I became curious and tried a brief web search.

A web page gives some justification of sorts why we can use goose(s)-geese(p), but not moose(s)-meese(p).
Look for the part of the page headed with "Why isn't "meese" the correct plural?"
https://languagetool.org/insights/post/plural-of-moose/
 
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: jack action
Science news on Phys.org
symbolipoint said:
The piece came-up from the "Lame Jokes" section of the forum. Someobody carried a step from one of the posts and I became curious and tried a brief web search.

A web page gives some justification of sorts why we can use goose(s)-geese(p), but not moose(s)-meese(p).
Look for the part of the page headed with "Why isn't "meese" the correct plural?"
https://languagetool.org/insights/post/plural-of-moose/
Of course it's not "meeses", it's "meeces"!
As in "I hate those meeces to pieces" - to quote Mr. Jinks.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Bystander and DaveC426913
symbolipoint said:
A web page gives some justification of sorts why we can use goose(s)-geese(p), but not moose(s)-meese(p).
Look for the part of the page headed with "Why isn't "meese" the correct plural?"
https://languagetool.org/insights/post/plural-of-moose/
Given that this is a shill for their product LanguageTool, I am skeptical about their version of facts. 🤔



Anyway,

I think the question is not "Why is it moose and not meese?"; I think the question is "Why is it geese and not gooses?"

Because it's geese that's the exception to the rule (along with mice and a few others).
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: DEvens and PeroK
Simply put, English is a language that has evolved over the centuries with a lot of input from other languages, specifically old Norse, Latin, and German.
 
bryantcl said:
Simply put, English is a language that has evolved over the centuries with a lot of input from other languages, specifically old Norse, Latin, and German.
Diplomatically put.

I'd say English is three languages standing on each other's shoulders, wearing a trenchcoat, pretending to be a real language.
 
  • Wow
  • Haha
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: difalcojr, BillTre and symbolipoint
DaveC426913 said:
Diplomatically put.

I'd say English is three languages standing on each other's shoulders, wearing a trenchcoat, pretending to be a real language.
If I wasn't a native speaker I would refuse to learn it.
 
bryantcl said:
Simply put, English is a language that has evolved over the centuries with a lot of input from other languages, specifically old Norse, Latin, and German.
And sometimes from languages of other regions, such as indigenous ones from places in North America.
 
DaveC426913 said:
Given that this is a shill for their product LanguageTool, I am skeptical about their version of facts.
The bit of consistent information also occurred in another web site/page. I simply included the link to the first page found which had the explanation.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: DaveC426913
DaveC426913 said:
I think the question is not "Why is it moose and not meese?"; I think the question is "Why is it geese and not gooses?"

Because it's geese that's the exception to the rule (along with mice and a few others).
Old Germanic (s,p) - regular plurals
Goose = /go:s, go:si/
Mouse = /mu:s, mu:siz/
Moose = was ist das?*

Old/Middle English - i-mutation occurs, causing the root vowel of the plural to be pronounced closer to the vowel of the ending;
then loss of the redundant ending (as you now can distinguish the number even if you omit the ending)
Goose = /go:s, ge:s/
Mouse = /mu:s, my:s/
Moose = hwat is thaet?*

Early Modern English - great vowel shift occurs, raising all vowels or diphtongising those that couldn't be raised further
Goose = /gu:s, gi:s/
Mouse = /maus, mais/
Moose = behold this magnificent animal, the Indians call it /mu:s/

I.e., as the link said, moose was introduced to the language after the vowel changes that generated the irregular plurals, so it wasn't subject to change.

*or however you would write these
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Likes   Reactions: Klystron, PeroK and DaveC426913
  • #10
Bandersnatch said:
Old Germanic (s,p) - regular plurals
Goose = /go:s, go:si/
Mouse = /mu:s, mu:siz/
Moose = was ist das?*
Moose is from an Algonquin word; not Germanic. That was related to be part of the reason that plural does not go to "Meese".
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: difalcojr
  • #11
Bandersnatch said:
Moose = behold this magnificent animal, the Indians call it /mu:s/
Yah that's what seemed to be expressed in the online articles & pages.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 65 ·
3
Replies
65
Views
11K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K