Why Is the Relative Velocity Between Two Opposing Balls Added?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around understanding relative velocity in the context of two balls moving towards each other: a green ball traveling east at 6 m/s and a red ball traveling west at 2 m/s. The original poster is confused about why the velocities are added to determine the relative velocity of the green ball from the perspective of the red ball.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster questions the reasoning behind adding the velocities instead of subtracting them, given the opposing directions of the balls. Some participants suggest visualizing the scenario from the perspective of the red ball to clarify the concept of relative velocity.

Discussion Status

Participants are exploring the concept of relative velocity, with some providing explanations about vector direction and the significance of signs in velocity values. There is an ongoing inquiry into the meaning of "in the frame of" or "in the reference of," indicating a productive exploration of the topic.

Contextual Notes

Participants are discussing the implications of directionality in velocity and how it affects calculations of relative motion. The conversation reflects an attempt to clarify foundational concepts in physics related to motion and reference frames.

mohabitar
Messages
140
Reaction score
0
I'm watching a lecture video describing the following situation:

There is a red ball and a green ball on a collision course. The green ball moves with a constant velocity 6 m/s due East, while the red ball moves with a constant velocity 2 m/s due west.

They are saying that the velocity of the green ball in the frame of the red ball is 8 m/s. I'm not understanding why it's 8. Obviously they are adding the two velocities together, but why? One would think that since green is headed east and red is headed west, that we should subtract the values. What's the reasoning behind this? Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Imagine yourself moving along with the red ball. Maybe that will make it a bit clearer.

For a slightly more detailed explanation: to find relative velocity, you should actually subtract the two velocities. But velocity is a vector, which means it's not just the number of m/s that matters, it's the direction. For objects moving along a line, you indicate the direction by a sign: to the right (east) is positive, and to the left (west) is negative. So in your example, the green ball has velocity +6 m/s, but the red ball has velocity -2 m/s. When you subtract those, (green)-(red), you get +8 m/s. Thus the velocity of the green ball in the frame of the red ball is +8 m/s.

To see why you subtract instead of adding, imagine a new situation, a red ball and a green ball both moving to the east at 4 m/s. Both of them are moving in the same direction, so they both have the same sign on the velocity: both velocities are +4 m/s. You agree that the velocity of the green ball in the frame of the red ball is 0, right? Obviously adding the numbers doesn't give you the right answer. But subtracting them does.
 
Thanks a lot for your answer. Really helped clear things up. However, what exactly does 'in the reference of' or 'in the frame of' really mean?
 
It's kind of like "as if you were traveling along with". So when they ask for the velocity of the green ball in the frame of the red ball, they want to know what velocity you would observe the green ball to have if you were moving along with the red ball.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
1K
Replies
34
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
5K