High School Why is the set {(x,y)∈Ω×R|y=f(x)} a manifold?

  • Thread starter Thread starter SaschaSIGI
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Manifold Set
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The set {(x,y)∈Ω×R|y=f(x)} is a manifold if f is a smooth function defined on an open subset Ω of R^m. This set represents the graph of the function f, which is an m-dimensional manifold in R^{m+1}. To prove this, one must construct a homeomorphism from an open neighborhood of any point in the set to an open subset of R^m. However, the proposition fails if Ω is not a manifold, as demonstrated by the example where Ω = {0} ∪ [1,2] and f(x) = x, resulting in a non-manifold structure.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of smooth functions in calculus
  • Familiarity with the concept of manifolds
  • Knowledge of homeomorphisms in topology
  • Basic principles of graph theory in mathematics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of smooth functions and their graphs
  • Learn about the definition and examples of manifolds
  • Explore homeomorphisms and their applications in topology
  • Investigate the implications of the Jacobian determinant in manifold theory
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of topology, and anyone interested in understanding the properties of manifolds and smooth functions in higher dimensions.

SaschaSIGI
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I am thinking why the following holds: Let f be a smooth function with f: Ω⊂R^m→R. Why is the set {(x,y)∈Ω×R|y=f(x)} a manifold?
Would be helpful if you are providing me some guidance or tips:)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That set is the locus of function ##f##, and is a subset of ##\Omega\times \mathbb R##, which in turn is a subset of ##\mathbb R^{m+1}##.
By analogy with the locii of function from ##\mathbb R\to\mathbb R## ( a line, ie one-dimensional manifold in a 2D space), and from ##\mathbb R^2\to \mathbb R## (a surface or 2D manifold in a 3D space), we'd expect the set to be a ##m##-dimensional manifold.

Your mission, should you choose to accept it, is to, for any arbitrary point in the set, construct a homeomorphism from an open neighbourhood of the point to an open subset of ##\mathbb R^m##. If you can do that, you've proven the set is a ##m##-dimensional manifold.

Construction of that homeomorphism may involve the function ##f## in some way, or at least use its property of smoothness.

EDIT: Just realised the proposition is not true unless we require ##\Omega## to be a manifold. Consider where ##\Omega = \{0\} \cup [1,2]## and ##f(x)=x##. Then neither the domain nor the locus of ##f## is a manifold. They are each the union of a 0-dimensional manifold with a 1-dimensional manifold with boundary.
 
Last edited:
SaschaSIGI said:
I am thinking why the following holds: Let f be a smooth function with f: Ω⊂R^m→R. Why is the set {(x,y)∈Ω×R|y=f(x)} a manifold?
Would be helpful if you are providing me some guidance or tips:)
The open set ##\Omega\subset\mathbb{R}^m## with the standard coordinates is a coordinate patch in this graph, so the graph is a manifold
 
Last edited:
Proving this in the one dimensional case first is probably instructive if you're still lost.
 
Basic principle: a graph is isomorphic to its domain. i.e. map x in the domain to (x,f(x)), and map back the point (x,f(x)) to x, via projection onto the "x axis".

remember this, it is very useful.
 
IIRC, there are results regarding the Jacobian being nonzero.
 
wrobel said:
The open set ##\Omega\subset\mathbb{R}^m## with the standard coordinates is a coordinate patch in this graph, so the graph is a manifold
Why do you assume ##\Omega## is open?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K