Why is the strong Nuclear force the strongest?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the comparative strengths of fundamental forces, specifically the strong nuclear force, electromagnetic force, and gravity. Participants analyze the magnitudes of these forces using Coulomb's law, revealing that the electrostatic force between protons is significantly stronger than the gravitational force. They explore the implications of altering mass on the strength of these forces, concluding that the inherent properties of the forces dictate their relative strengths. The conversation highlights the complexities of force interactions, particularly in the context of nuclear fusion and the challenges of integrating gravity into quantum physics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Coulomb's law and its application in calculating electrostatic forces
  • Basic knowledge of nuclear physics, particularly the strong nuclear force
  • Familiarity with the concepts of gravity and its role in mass interactions
  • Awareness of the challenges in reconciling quantum physics with general relativity
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of the strong nuclear force in nuclear fusion processes
  • Study the role of coupling constants in determining the strength of fundamental forces
  • Explore the current theories regarding the graviton and its potential role in quantum gravity
  • Investigate the mathematical models used to describe force interactions at the subatomic level
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, students of nuclear physics, and anyone interested in the fundamental forces of nature and their interactions, particularly in the context of nuclear fusion and theoretical physics.

  • #31
That was not my intention, sorry. English is not my native language, and I do not like to write 100 words if I can express the same content with 10 or 1. Can you explain which parts appear slightly insulting to you?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
The 'This is just wrong' remark was a bit of a kick in the nuts, but that's ok, I understand =) It's not often you get to converse with decent, respectable people on the Internet but PhysicsForums seems to be a hub for the helpful and considerate. Anyway, I'm straying away from the thread topic and the rules ask us not to so I'll depart. Thanks again, everyone.
 
  • #33
JakusLarkus hey don't take that personally because throughout the quest for knowledge we all amke and have made mistakes and if someone says that you are wrong (theoretically or empirically) then it is just that your state of knowledge about the matter might need some help not you as a human being , so it is always good to not "fall in love" or take basic physical descriptions of natural laws or phenomenon very personally because later you will find out that either you were wrong at some point about them or maybe science will have something better at the time to offer as an explanation.

We all have made mistakes and history of science also the history of the world as a whole is full with them , but then again they are here to help us become better so every "kick in the balls" makes you stronger in this case.
 
  • #34
Hi Jakus...you said ..
The 'This is just wrong' remark was a bit of a kick...

perhaps some posters will even be mean intentionally...you have two choices here...if you just want to show off and somebody criticizes you, well that's just too bad...on the other hand if you want to learn, then accept corrections when you believe them accurate...

Did you survive, learn something, and move on...bravo, that's the key to life!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
9K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K