Why is the term 'Big Bang' a misnomer?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Richard87
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Big bang
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The term "Big Bang" is a misnomer that misrepresents the nature of the event, leading many to incorrectly visualize it as a destructive explosion. Fred Hoyle originally coined the term derisively, which has since been adopted by the media and public. Current research is shifting towards models like the "big bounce," which suggest a prior contraction leading to high density and quantum effects that alter gravitational behavior. The field of quantum cosmology is pivotal for understanding these evolving concepts and their implications for cosmic predictions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic cosmological concepts
  • Familiarity with quantum mechanics principles
  • Knowledge of the cosmic microwave background
  • Awareness of scientific terminology and journal databases
NEXT STEPS
  • Research "quantum cosmology" and its implications for the Big Bang theory
  • Explore models of the "big bounce" in cosmological studies
  • Utilize the Spires database for recent articles on quantum cosmology
  • Investigate the role of language in shaping scientific understanding
USEFUL FOR

Cosmologists, physicists, science communicators, and anyone interested in the evolution of cosmological theories and their terminology.

Richard87
Messages
31
Reaction score
0
"Big Bang" is a misnomer.

And as a consequence of this misnomer, most non-cosmologists continue to picture it as a big explosion. Though they forget that explosions are destructive rather than creative. The Big Bang being an explosion just wouldn't make any sense. It wasn't an explosion.
 
Space news on Phys.org


Fred Hoyle used that term derisively when discussing the theory in an interview, and the popular media and the public picked it up.
 


But simply changing the name doesn't solve much. Laypeople will not be enlightened about physics from two-word sound bytes.

They should put physics primers at the checkout lines at grocery stores...
 


Richard87 said:
And as a consequence of this misnomer, most non-cosmologists continue to picture it as a big explosion. Though they forget that explosions are destructive rather than creative. The Big Bang being an explosion just wouldn't make any sense. It wasn't an explosion.

I think you are right, Richard. Words matter, and inevitably influence how we (as a species) think. This "big bang" misnomer is a kink in our language, like a sprain that eventually has to heal, or a cramp in a muscle that will eventually go away.

language normally can't be reformed by fiat. But it does gradually change and problems gradually get massaged away or unravel.

One of the most hopeful developments is that the Bang image is now being challenged by the image of a big bounce. A bunch of models are increasingly studied where there is a prior contraction, leading to very high (but not infinite) density at which quantum effects cause gravity to briefly repel instead of continuing to attract.
These models apparently lead to slightly different predictions which hopefully will allow them to be tested---subtly different predictions about fine detail in the cosmic microwave background.
 


If you want to get an idea of how our big bang concept is gradually morphing, which will eventually lead to a different image and different words, then the field of research to watch is called "quantum cosmology".

There is a professional journal data base called Spires that can do a keyword search and turn up all the recent quantum cosmology articles. If desired, Spires will rank them according to citation count---how often a given scholarly article has been cited as a reference in other research articles.

I have to go. I'll get the link to Spires later.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
4K
  • · Replies 56 ·
2
Replies
56
Views
8K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 44 ·
2
Replies
44
Views
6K