Why is the value of PI not absolute?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter webboffin
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Absolute Pi Value
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the mathematical nature of the value of pi (π), particularly addressing why it may be perceived as not absolute. Participants explore concepts related to irrational and transcendental numbers, the implications of infinite decimal representations, and the understanding of pi in relation to geometric contexts.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that the value of pi is absolute, emphasizing that it is a well-defined number despite its infinite decimal representation.
  • Others argue that the infinite nature of pi's decimal representation leads to confusion about its "absolute" value, suggesting that this perception is common but incorrect.
  • It is noted that pi is both an irrational and transcendental number, which contributes to its complexity and the difficulty in expressing its value in decimal form.
  • One participant highlights that while pi cannot be expressed as a simple fraction, there are series representations that can approximate its value.
  • Another participant questions the relationship between pi and geometric constructs, suggesting that the ability to draw a circle implies a concrete representation of pi.
  • A later reply emphasizes that the inability to write down all digits of pi does not imply that its value is unknowable or not exact.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the nature of pi's value, with some asserting its absoluteness and others questioning this perspective. The discussion remains unresolved, with multiple competing views present.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the complexity of pi's representation and the challenges in understanding its properties, particularly in relation to irrationality and transcendence. There are references to mathematical proofs that are acknowledged as being difficult to comprehend.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to those exploring mathematical concepts related to irrational and transcendental numbers, as well as individuals curious about the nature of mathematical constants and their representations.

webboffin
Messages
24
Reaction score
0
Why is the value of PI not absolute mathematically?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
The value of pi is 100% absolute.

EDIT: nugatory brings up a good point. I interpreted your question to be asking why pi doesn't have an exact, known value. It does. If this is not what you were asking, please clarify.
 
Last edited:
webboffin said:
Why is the value of PI not absolute mathematically?

Can you be a bit more precise about what you mean by "absolute" in this context?
 
The value of PI is an irrational number so it's value is infinitely long.
 
webboffin said:
The value of PI is an irrational number so it's value is infinitely long.

No, its decimal representation is infinitely long. Its value is not infinitely long, nor do I know what that would mean. :smile:
 
I don't know what you mean either
 
webboffin said:
I don't know what you mean either

Just because the decimal representation of pi is infinitely long doesn't mean we know anything less about its value.

You asked why the value of Pi isn't absolute, but Pi is a number and it is well defined, so the value of Pi is absolute. That a number can't be expressed in a specific way in our decimal system doesn't make its value unknowable.
 
Last edited:
webboffin said:
Why is the value of PI not absolute mathematically?
...
The value of PI is an irrational number so it's value is infinitely long.

OK, now that you've clarified what you're asking...

Not only is pi an irrational number, it is a transcendental number (all transcendentals are irrational, but not all irrationals are transcendental). Knowing that, you can google for "pi transcendental proof" to find the standard proofs for why pi must be transcendental... But be aware that some of this material is going to be fairly heavy going, and if you have follow-up questions you might want to try the General Mathematics forum on this site.

And don't let yourself get too hung up on this "infinitely long value". Pi still corresponds to a single point on the number line, just like any other number. True, we can't write its value down as a decimal without using an infinite number of digits, but that's doesn't mean it doesn't have an exact value, just that we can't write that value down as decimal number.

BTW, would you accept ##\pi=(\Gamma(\frac{1}{2}))^2## as an exact value for pi?
 
Like Nugatory already said, saying that ##\pi## is infinitely long makes no real sense mathematically. I can't blame you though, people say this all the time. It's just not correct.

What you mean is of course that ##\pi## has an infinite decimal representation. This is true. But ##1/3## also has an infinite decimal representation, indeed, it is

0.33333333333333333...

The difference with ##\pi## is that we know each digit in ##1/3##, but we don't easily know all digits in ##\pi## without some heavy calculations. This is because ##\pi## is irrational. Proofs of irrationality of ##\pi## (and even transcendence) can be found in a lot of places, but are very difficult.
 
  • #10
Pi is the area of the circle with radius 1. Perhaps area just doesn't apply that well to circles, I don't know any better reason for why π is like it is. Squares and circles are just not like each other.
 
  • #11
The simplicity of Pi

Often people think of pi as being far more complex than say 1/3 or the fifth root of 2. In a sense that is true as it is not a fraction, a surd expression or even the root of a polynomial. But it happens that there are representation which are as simple to express as some of these numbers.

Perhaps the simplest (and also one of the slowest converging) is this:

pi = 4*(1 - 1/3 + 1/5 - 1/7 + 1/9 - ... )

[ If I was famous, it would probably be a great anecdote to say that I typed this program into an earlier personal computer at a computer fair in 1978, having only learned how to send programs by post to a mainframe from school, and was worried about the harm I might have done by sending it into an infinite loop. But I'm not. :) ]
 
  • #12
If the value of ##π## is not absolute, then each time one draws a circle it will look different every time.

But then the fact that you can always draw a circle shows that you can, so to say crudely, represent ##π## in an exact and simple way, notwithstanding its decimal representation.
 
  • #13
Thanks guys, you are now making sense to me and my apologies if I didn't seem clear initially to the question I was asking but you anyway got the gist of what I was meaning. PI does have an exact value but just not able to decimally write is own its entire value... I got the point good with the 1/3 demonstration. Again, thanks.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
3K
  • · Replies 171 ·
6
Replies
171
Views
12K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
7K