Why is there no acceleration in the southern/y direction?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a problem related to motion in a river, specifically addressing the absence of acceleration in the southern direction while considering the velocity of the river and its implications on the overall motion.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the relationship between velocity and acceleration, questioning the assumptions made about the river's flow and its implications on acceleration in different directions.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with participants examining the implications of the problem statement regarding the river's speed and its effect on acceleration. Some guidance has been offered regarding the interpretation of the problem, but multiple interpretations are still being explored.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the problem statement specifies a constant speed for the river, which leads to discussions about the assumptions regarding acceleration, particularly in the absence of explicit values for acceleration in the problem.

yashboi123
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
A river flows due south with a speed of 2.5 m/s. You steer a motorboat across the river; your velocity relative to the water is 5.2 m/s due east. The river is 650 m wide.

How far south of your starting point will you reach the opposite bank?
Relevant Equations
Δ x = v 0 t + 1 2 a t 2
v = v 0 + a t
Δ x/ Δt = v
The correct answer is obtained by rearranging Δ x/ Δt = v. However, I assumed there would be some acceleration in the y direction so I tried to use the kinematic equations. To find the time I simply rearranged Δ x/ Δt = v, assigning v=5.2 m/s and Δ x = 650. I assumed there is no acceleration in the x/east direction, but why is there no acceleration in the y/southern direction?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Think about what “velocity relative to the water” means.
 
so essentially relative to water means that speed is constant, in turn causing there to be no acceleration for the east direction. But why can we just assume the river has no acceleration?
 
yashboi123 said:
But why can we just assume the river has no acceleration?
Because the problem statement says that the river flows at a speed of 2.5m/s.
That implies an acceleration of 0.

Also, you're not given a value for acceleration, so if you aren't going to assume zero, what value would you assume?
 
I see, thank you.
 
DaveC426913 said:
Because the problem statement says that the river flows at a speed of 2.5m/s.
That implies an acceleration of 0.

Also, you're not given a value for acceleration, so if you aren't going to assume zero, what value would you assume?
Haha I thought we would have to find the acceleration ourselves then solve
 
Why do you keep saying "acceleration" ?
 
hmmm27 said:
Why do you keep saying "acceleration" ?
What else should I say.
 
yashboi123 said:
What else should I say.
Something relevant to the question, which has nothing that implies an acceleration.
 
  • #10
That's why I asked the question
 
  • #11
So, what do you see as implying the need for an "acceleration" ?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
Replies
13
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K